活细胞成像用于比较磷酸钙纳米颗粒和脂质体转染试剂的转染及基因沉默效率。
Live-cell imaging to compare the transfection and gene silencing efficiency of calcium phosphate nanoparticles and a liposomal transfection agent.
作者信息
Chernousova S, Epple M
机构信息
Inorganic Chemistry and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
出版信息
Gene Ther. 2017 May;24(5):282-289. doi: 10.1038/gt.2017.13. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
The processing of DNA (for transfection) and short interfering RNA (siRNA; for gene silencing), introduced into HeLa cells by triple-shell calcium phosphate nanoparticles, was followed by live-cell imaging. For comparison, the commercial liposomal transfection agent Lipofectamine was used. The cells were incubated with these delivery systems, carrying either enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-encoding DNA or siRNA against eGFP. In the latter case, HeLa cells that stably expressed eGFP were used. The expression of eGFP started after 5 h in the case of nanoparticles and after 4 h in the case of Lipofectamine. The corresponding times for gene silencing were 5 h (nanoparticles) and immediately after incubation (Lipofectamine). The expression of eGFP was notably enhanced 2-3 h after cell division (mitosis). In general, the transfection and gene silencing efficiencies of the nanoparticles were lower than those of Lipofectamime, even at a substantially higher dose (factor 20) of nucleic acids. However, the cytotoxicity of the nanoparticles was lower than that of Lipofectamine, making them suitable vectors for in vivo application.
通过三层磷酸钙纳米颗粒将DNA(用于转染)和小干扰RNA(siRNA;用于基因沉默)导入HeLa细胞后,进行活细胞成像。作为对照,使用了商业脂质体转染试剂Lipofectamine。将细胞与这些递送系统一起孵育,这些递送系统携带编码增强型绿色荧光蛋白(eGFP)的DNA或针对eGFP的siRNA。在后一种情况下,使用稳定表达eGFP的HeLa细胞。对于纳米颗粒,eGFP的表达在5小时后开始;对于Lipofectamine,在4小时后开始。基因沉默的相应时间分别为5小时(纳米颗粒)和孵育后立即(Lipofectamine)。在细胞分裂(有丝分裂)后2-3小时,eGFP的表达显著增强。总体而言,即使在核酸剂量显著更高(20倍)的情况下,纳米颗粒的转染和基因沉默效率仍低于Lipofectamine。然而,纳米颗粒的细胞毒性低于Lipofectamine,使其成为适合体内应用的载体。