Suppr超能文献

嵌入式研究模式:社区服务组织研究和评估需求的解决方案?

The embedded research model: an answer to the research and evaluation needs of community service organizations?

机构信息

Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Princes Highway, Warrnambool, VIC, 3280, Australia.

Brophy Family and Youth Services, Warrnambool, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 20;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01246-z.

Abstract

There is an increasing need to provide evidence of outcomes within the community services sector. However, funding challenges, workforce pressures, and the complex social contexts in which community service organizations operate limit their potential for organizational capacity building. This has flow on effects on the ability to conduct impactful and strategic research. The embedded research model (i.e., when a researcher is embedded into a "host" organisation) may aid in building research and evaluation capacity. This may be particularly useful for the purposes of routine outcome monitoring and continuous quality improvement, which may in turn lead to opportunities for local research and evaluation through the embedded research model. Previous research on the embedded research model across various settings has suggested a number of lessons for implementation. However, to date, nil research has focused on community service organizations. Additional considerations need to be made within this context due to resource limitations, ethical issues, and diverse reporting requirements. Such considerations include the need to take a 'slow science' approach to research and evaluation outputs, consideration of the organisation's readiness for change, and the need to report activities in a transparent, thorough, and consistent manner. The endorsement of embedded research in community service organisations may aid in providing evidence of outcomes for clients, and simultaneously, increase the ability for policymakers to evidence-informed decisions on how to improve outcomes for the local population.

摘要

越来越需要提供社区服务部门的成果证据。然而,资金挑战、劳动力压力以及社区服务组织运作的复杂社会背景限制了它们进行组织能力建设的潜力。这对开展有影响力和战略性研究的能力产生了连锁反应。嵌入式研究模式(即研究人员嵌入“宿主”组织)可能有助于建立研究和评估能力。对于常规结果监测和持续质量改进的目的,这可能特别有用,这反过来又可以通过嵌入式研究模式为当地研究和评估提供机会。先前在各种环境下对嵌入式研究模式的研究提出了一些实施方面的经验教训。然而,迄今为止,还没有任何研究专注于社区服务组织。由于资源限制、道德问题和不同的报告要求,需要在这方面进行额外的考虑。这些考虑因素包括需要对研究和评估成果采取“慢科学”方法,考虑组织对变革的准备程度,以及需要以透明、全面和一致的方式报告活动。在社区服务组织中认可嵌入式研究可能有助于为客户提供成果证据,同时提高决策者为当地居民改善成果提供循证决策的能力。

相似文献

1
The embedded research model: an answer to the research and evaluation needs of community service organizations?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 20;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01246-z.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation capacity building in a rural Victorian community service organisation: A formative evaluation.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0322906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322906. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The implementation checklist: A pragmatic instrument for accelerating research-to-implementation cycles.
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Jan 27;7(3):e10359. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10359. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
"Slow science" for 21st century healthcare: reinventing health service research that serves fast-paced, high-complexity care organisations.
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 May 4;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):701-16. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2020-0218.
5
Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(suppl_1):i64-i70. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx125.
6
Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):321-330. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007226. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Developing middle-ground research to support primary care transformation.
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):498-499. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693209.
8
Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.
9
The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):70-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004877. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Knowledge Co-production at the Research-Practice Interface: Embedded Case Studies from Urban Forestry.
Environ Manage. 2016 Jun;57(6):1262-80. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0680-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验