• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南澳大利亚州一家医疗服务机构的持续质量改进及其在学习型医疗系统中所发挥的作用:一项定性研究

Continuous quality improvement across a South Australian health service and the role it plays in a learning health system: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Bierbaum Mia, Hillier Susan, Ellis Louise A, Clay-Williams Robyn, Goodrich Angie, Padbury Robert, Hibbert Peter

机构信息

IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12557-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12557-4
PMID:40148960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11951570/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives are commonly used to enhance patient safety and quality of care. A novel South Australian Local Health Network (SALHN) Continuous Improvement Program (CIP009) has integrated a top-down model of executive-directed change initiatives, with a bottom-up approach of clinician designed interventions to address an organisational-wide goal of improved patient flow. This study evaluated the strengths and challenges of CIP009 implementation from the perspective of participants and deliverers.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted in 2023/2024 to evaluate the implementation of CIP009 and 12 associated quality improvement projects. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with key stakeholders (executives, coaches and CIP009 fellows) and guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A document review and observations of CIP009 team meetings were also conducted. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis, then deductively mapped against the five CFIR domains.

RESULTS

Thirty-one participants were interviewed individually or in focus groups, two presentation days and six team meetings were observed, and 78 documents were reviewed. Seven key themes were identified highlighting key challenges and strengths of CIP009 implementation within the SALHN setting. These included four key strengths: the CIP framework and culture (the flexible framework, common language, training, and a culture of flattened hierarchy); the benefits of support from a dedicated, internal improvement Faculty (wrap around support from coaches); the advantages of an enthusiastic team member disposition and incentives (vested interests to enhance workflow and patient outcomes); and effective teams and team composition (teams comprised of senior clinician change agents). Three key challenges included: workforce and organisation-level challenges (individual workloads, workforce capacity, and data access); team cohesion, logistics and stakeholder engagement challenges (issues in the way teams worked together); and training and support shortcomings (the training course, and the top-down nature of CIP009).

CONCLUSION

This evaluation identified that CIP009 was considered an effective multifaceted CQI program. The strengths of CIP009 support a learning health system (a data driven model, utilising systematic frameworks, with commitment from leadership, and a culture of continuous learning). Further integration of implementation science principles may support the program to overcome the key challenges identified. These findings will inform and guide improvement efforts within future iterations of CIP.

摘要

引言

持续质量改进(CQI)举措通常用于提高患者安全和护理质量。南澳大利亚地方卫生网络(SALHN)的一项新型持续改进计划(CIP009)将自上而下的行政主导变革举措模式与自下而上的临床医生设计干预方法相结合,以实现改善患者流程这一全组织范围的目标。本研究从参与者和实施者的角度评估了CIP009实施的优势和挑战。

方法

2023年至2024年进行了一项定性研究,以评估CIP009及12个相关质量改进项目的实施情况。对关键利益相关者(管理人员、教练和CIP009研究员)进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,并以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为指导。还对CIP009团队会议进行了文件审查和观察。使用主题分析对数据进行归纳分析,然后根据CFIR的五个领域进行演绎映射。

结果

对31名参与者进行了个人访谈或焦点小组讨论,观察了两个展示日和六次团队会议,并审查了78份文件。确定了七个关键主题,突出了在SALHN环境中实施CIP009的关键挑战和优势。其中包括四个关键优势:CIP框架和文化(灵活的框架、通用语言、培训以及扁平化等级制度的文化);来自专门的内部改进教员支持的好处(教练提供全方位支持);热情的团队成员态度和激励措施的优势(增强工作流程和患者结果的既得利益);以及有效的团队和团队组成(由资深临床医生变革推动者组成的团队)。三个关键挑战包括:劳动力和组织层面的挑战(个人工作量、劳动力能力和数据访问);团队凝聚力、后勤和利益相关者参与方面的挑战(团队合作方式存在的问题);以及培训和支持的不足(培训课程以及CIP009的自上而下性质)。

结论

本次评估确定CIP009是一个有效的多方面CQI计划。CIP009的优势支持学习型卫生系统(一种数据驱动的模式,利用系统框架,有领导的承诺以及持续学习的文化)。进一步整合实施科学原则可能支持该计划克服所确定的关键挑战。这些发现将为CIP未来迭代中的改进工作提供信息和指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8c9/11951570/1363e99cf22c/12913_2025_12557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8c9/11951570/1363e99cf22c/12913_2025_12557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8c9/11951570/1363e99cf22c/12913_2025_12557_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous quality improvement across a South Australian health service and the role it plays in a learning health system: a qualitative study.南澳大利亚州一家医疗服务机构的持续质量改进及其在学习型医疗系统中所发挥的作用:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12557-4.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

本文引用的文献

1
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):71-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972.
2
Implementation of large, multi-site hospital interventions: a realist evaluation of strategies for developing capability.大型多地点医院干预措施的实施:发展能力策略的实际评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10721-w.
3
Exploring healthcare providers' perspectives on virtual care delivery: insights into telemedicine services.
探索医疗保健提供者对虚拟医疗服务的看法:远程医疗服务的见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10244-w.
4
Bridging the Silos: A Comparative Analysis of Implementation Science and Improvement Science.跨越壁垒:实施科学与改进科学的比较分析
Front Health Serv. 2022 Feb 4;1:817750. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2021.817750. eCollection 2021.
5
Rates of adherence to cancer treatment guidelines in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: A systematic review.澳大利亚癌症治疗指南的依从率及与依从性相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;19(6):618-644. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13948. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Conceptualizing learning health systems: A mapping review.学习型健康系统的概念化:一项映射综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Jun 2;7(1):e10311. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10311. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Clinical practice guideline adherence in oncology: A qualitative study of insights from clinicians in Australia.临床实践指南在肿瘤学中的应用:来自澳大利亚临床医生的定性研究洞察。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 16;17(12):e0279116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279116. eCollection 2022.
8
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
9
The Evaluation of an Interprofessional QI Program: A Qualitative Study.跨专业质量改进计划评估:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10087. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610087.
10
Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的可信度
J Hum Lact. 2022 Nov;38(4):598-602. doi: 10.1177/08903344221116620. Epub 2022 Aug 4.