Blackmore Derrick, Siddiqi Zaeem A
Department of Neurology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2017 Mar;18(3):125-131. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000154.
Despite its relative common occurrence, definitive diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) remains problematic. In practice, patients with pain, numbness, and/or paresthesias in their lower limbs are diagnosed with SFN if found to have dissociated sensory loss in their feet, that is, impaired pinprick perception (PP) but relatively preserved vibration. We sought to assess the sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination and various diagnostic tools available for screening SFN.
Medical records of 56 patients diagnosed with SFN were reviewed. Diagnosis was based on symptoms, detailed neurological examination that included PP, and abnormal results on at least one testing modality-quantitative sudomotor axon reflex (sweat) test (QSART), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and heart rate variability (HRV) testing.
Sensitivity of PP was relatively consistent between modalities of about 63% in presence of appropriate sensory symptoms. Laboratory testing diagnosed 88% of patients when both QSART and QST are employed. QST was most sensitive for detection of SFN with the heat-pain testing having higher sensitivity than cooling. Heart rate variability testing revealed low correlation across all groups.
The diagnostic yield for SFN increases by combining clinical features with various testing modalities. In symptomatic patients, we propose the following diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of SFN: Definite SFN-abnormal neurological examination and both QSART and QST; Probable SFN-abnormal neurological examination, and either QSART or QST; Possible SFN-abnormal neurological exam, QSART, or QST.
尽管小纤维神经病变(SFN)相对常见,但明确诊断仍存在问题。在实际操作中,下肢出现疼痛、麻木和/或感觉异常的患者,如果足部存在分离性感觉丧失,即针刺觉(PP)受损但振动觉相对保留,则被诊断为SFN。我们试图评估临床检查以及用于筛查SFN的各种诊断工具的敏感性和特异性。
回顾了56例被诊断为SFN患者的病历。诊断基于症状、包括PP的详细神经系统检查,以及至少一种检测方式——定量汗腺轴突反射(汗液)试验(QSART)、定量感觉测试(QST)和心率变异性(HRV)测试的异常结果。
在存在适当感觉症状的情况下,PP的敏感性在不同检测方式之间相对一致,约为63%。当同时采用QSART和QST时,实验室检测诊断出88%的患者。QST对SFN的检测最敏感,热痛测试的敏感性高于冷觉测试。心率变异性测试显示所有组之间的相关性较低。
将临床特征与各种检测方式相结合可提高SFN的诊断率。对于有症状的患者,我们提出以下SFN诊断标准:确诊SFN——神经系统检查异常且QSART和QST均异常;疑似SFN——神经系统检查异常,且QSART或QST异常;可能SFN——神经系统检查异常、QSART或QST异常。