de Ory F, León P, Domingo C, Garcia-Sáiz A, Pérez L, Echevarría J M
Servicio de Virología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Virología en Immunología Sanitarias, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Aug;6(4):402-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02013094.
Three commercial methods (enzyme immunoassay, fluoroimmunoassay and latex agglutination) and a complement fixation test were compared for detection of cytomegalovirus antibodies using a panel of 490 serum samples from blood and organ donors, from immunocompromised patients and paired sera from five patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection. An indirect immunofluorescence test for antibodies to cytomegalovirus was used for classifying samples giving discrepant results by any of the four methods. All methods showed high sensitivity and specificity, but the enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination tests had the highest sensitivity. Latex agglutination is recommended for large-scale screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood and organ donors. Negative results obtained by latex agglutination should be confirmed by sensitive enzyme immunoassays.
使用来自血液和器官捐献者、免疫功能低下患者的490份血清样本以及5例近期感染巨细胞病毒患者的配对血清,比较了三种商业方法(酶免疫测定、荧光免疫测定和乳胶凝集试验)和补体结合试验检测巨细胞病毒抗体的效果。采用间接免疫荧光法检测巨细胞病毒抗体,用于对四种方法中结果不一致的样本进行分类。所有方法均显示出高灵敏度和特异性,但酶免疫测定和乳胶凝集试验的灵敏度最高。建议采用乳胶凝集试验对血液和器官捐献者进行巨细胞病毒抗体的大规模筛查。乳胶凝集试验获得的阴性结果应通过灵敏的酶免疫测定加以确认。