Schurman Jennifer Verrill, Deacy Amanda D, Johnson Rebecca J, Parker Jolynn, Williams Kristi, Wallace Dustin, Connelly Mark, Anson Lynn, Mroczka Kevin
Jennifer Verrill Schurman, Amanda D Deacy, Rebecca J Johnson, Dustin Wallace, Mark Connelly, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):81-88. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.81.
To increase evidence-based pain prevention strategy use during routine vaccinations in a pediatric primary care clinic using quality improvement methodology.
Specific intervention strategies (., comfort positioning, nonnutritive sucking and sucrose analgesia, distraction) were identified, selected and introduced in three waves, using a Plan-Do-Study-Act framework. System-wide change was measured from baseline to post-intervention by: (1) percent of vaccination visits during which an evidence-based pain prevention strategy was reported as being used; and (2) caregiver satisfaction ratings following the visit. Additionally, self-reported staff and caregiver attitudes and beliefs about pain prevention were measured at baseline and 1-year post-intervention to assess for possible long-term cultural shifts.
Significant improvements were noted post-intervention. Use of at least one pain prevention strategy was documented at 99% of patient visits and 94% of caregivers were satisfied or very satisfied with the pain prevention care received. Parents/caregivers reported greater satisfaction with the specific pain prevention strategy used [(143) = 2.50, ≤ 0.05], as well as greater agreement that the pain prevention strategies used helped their children's pain [(180) = 2.17, ≤ 0.05] and that they would be willing to use the same strategy again in the future [(179) = 3.26, ≤ 0.001] as compared to baseline. Staff and caregivers also demonstrated a shift in attitudes from baseline to 1-year post-intervention. Specifically, staff reported greater agreement that the pain felt from vaccinations can result in harmful effects [2.47 3.10; (70) = -2.11, ≤ 0.05], less agreement that pain from vaccinations is "just part of the process" [3.94 3.23; (70) = 2.61, ≤ 0.05], and less agreement that parents expect their children to experience pain during vaccinations [4.81 4.38; (69) = 2.24, ≤ 0.05]. Parents/caregivers reported more favorable attitudes about pain prevention strategies for vaccinations across a variety of areas, including safety, cost, time, and effectiveness, as well as less concern about the pain their children experience with vaccination [4.08 3.26; (557) = 6.38, ≤ 0.001], less need for additional pain prevention strategies [3.33 2.81; (476) = 4.51, ≤ 0.001], and greater agreement that their doctors' office currently offers pain prevention for vaccinations [3.40 3.75; (433) = -2.39, ≤ 0.05].
Quality improvement methodology can be used to help close the gap in implementing pain prevention strategies during routine vaccination procedures for children.
运用质量改进方法,在一家儿科初级保健诊所的常规疫苗接种过程中,增加基于证据的疼痛预防策略的使用。
采用计划-实施-研究-改进框架,分三个阶段确定、选择并引入了特定的干预策略(如舒适体位、非营养性吸吮和蔗糖镇痛、分散注意力等)。通过以下方式衡量全系统的变化,从基线到干预后:(1)报告使用基于证据的疼痛预防策略的疫苗接种就诊百分比;(2)就诊后照顾者的满意度评分。此外,在基线和干预后1年测量工作人员和照顾者自我报告的关于疼痛预防的态度和信念,以评估可能的长期文化转变。
干预后有显著改善。99%的患者就诊记录显示使用了至少一种疼痛预防策略,94%的照顾者对所接受的疼痛预防护理感到满意或非常满意。与基线相比,父母/照顾者对所使用的特定疼痛预防策略的满意度更高[(143)=2.50,P≤0.05],也更认同所使用的疼痛预防策略有助于减轻孩子的疼痛[(180)=2.17,P≤0.05],并且更愿意在未来再次使用相同的策略[(179)=3.26,P≤0.001]。工作人员和照顾者从基线到干预后1年也表现出态度的转变。具体而言,工作人员更认同疫苗接种引起的疼痛会导致有害影响[2.47对3.10;(70)=-2.11,P≤0.05],不太认同疫苗接种疼痛“只是过程的一部分”[3.94对3.23;(70)=2.61,P≤0.05],也不太认同父母期望孩子在疫苗接种期间经历疼痛[4.81对4.38;(69)=2.24,P≤0.05]。父母/照顾者在多个方面对疫苗接种疼痛预防策略的态度更积极,包括安全性、成本、时间和有效性,也不太担心孩子接种疫苗时的疼痛[4.08对3.26;(557)=6.38,P≤0.001],对额外疼痛预防策略的需求更少[3.33对2.81;(476)=4.51,P≤0.001],并且更认同他们孩子的医生办公室目前提供疫苗接种疼痛预防[3.40对3.75;(433)=-2.39,P≤0.05]。
质量改进方法可用于帮助缩小儿童常规疫苗接种程序中实施疼痛预防策略方面的差距。