Suppr超能文献

是否需要重新考虑原发性自发性气胸的管理指南?

A need to reconsider guidelines on management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax?

作者信息

Yoon Jiyoon, Sivakumar Parthipan, O'Kane Kevin, Ahmed Liju

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Department of Emergency Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12245-017-0135-x. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The key guidelines in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) include the 2010 British Thoracic Society (BTS) Pleural Disease guideline and 2001 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Statement. Current recommendations are dependent on radiographic measures which differ between these two guidelines. The aim of this study is to compare size classification of PSP cases, according to BTS and ACCP guidelines, and to evaluate guideline compliance.

FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of all PSP episodes presenting to St Thomas' Hospital, London, between February 2013 and December 2014. Data was recorded from review of chest X-rays and patient records. Eighty-seven episodes of PSP in 72 patients were identified (median age 25 years, IQR 22-32.25). Classification of "large" and "small" showed the greatest disparity in those managed conservatively (12/27, 44%) or with aspiration only (11/23, 48%). In this UK study, BTS guidelines were followed in 70% of episodes with adherence to ACCP guidelines in 32% of episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a poor agreement in size classification between BTS and ACCP guidelines, resulting in conflicting recommendations for management of PSP. Robust clinical trial evidence is required to achieve international consensus on the management of PSP.

摘要

背景

原发性自发性气胸(PSP)管理的关键指南包括2010年英国胸科学会(BTS)胸膜疾病指南和2001年美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)共识声明。当前的建议依赖于影像学测量,而这两个指南中的测量方法有所不同。本研究的目的是根据BTS和ACCP指南比较PSP病例的大小分类,并评估指南的依从性。

研究结果

我们对2013年2月至2014年12月期间在伦敦圣托马斯医院就诊的所有PSP发作进行了回顾性评估。数据通过胸部X光片和患者记录回顾进行记录。共识别出72例患者的87次PSP发作(中位年龄25岁,四分位间距22 - 32.25岁)。“大”和“小 ” 的分类在保守治疗(12/27,44%)或仅行穿刺抽吸治疗(11/23,48%)的患者中差异最大。在这项英国研究中,70%的发作遵循BTS指南,32%的发作遵循ACCP指南。

结论

BTS和ACCP指南在大小分类方面的一致性较差,导致PSP管理的建议相互冲突。需要有力的临床试验证据来达成关于PSP管理的国际共识。

相似文献

3
Pneumothorax.气胸
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014 Mar;76(3):99-104. doi: 10.4046/trd.2014.76.3.99. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
7
Are BTS guidelines followed?是否遵循了英国胸科学会指南?
Emerg Nurse. 2002 Mar 1;9(10):7. doi: 10.7748/en.9.10.7.s13.
9
Spontaneous pneumothorax management.
Ir Med J. 2010 Oct;103(9):272-5.

引用本文的文献

4
An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population.青少年原发性自发性气胸的循证综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jun 18;2(3):e12449. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12449. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验