Bose Eliezer L, Clermont Gilles, Chen Lujie, Dubrawski Artur W, Ren Dianxu, Hoffman Leslie A, Pinsky Michael R, Hravnak Marilyn
The University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St., Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Schools of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Feb;32(1):117-126. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0001-7. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Cardiorespiratory instability (CRI) in monitored step-down unit (SDU) patients has a variety of etiologies, and likely manifests in patterns of vital signs (VS) changes. We explored use of clustering techniques to identify patterns in the initial CRI epoch (CRI; first exceedances of VS beyond stability thresholds after SDU admission) of unstable patients, and inter-cluster differences in admission characteristics and outcomes. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and pulse oximetry (SpO) were sampled at 1/20 Hz. We identified CRI in 165 patients, employed hierarchical and k-means clustering, tested several clustering solutions, used 10-fold cross validation to establish the best solution and assessed inter-cluster differences in admission characteristics and outcomes. Three clusters (C) were derived: C1) normal/high HR and RR, normal SpO (n = 30); C2) normal HR and RR, low SpO (n = 103); and C3) low/normal HR, low RR and normal SpO (n = 32). Clusters were significantly different based on age (p < 0.001; older patients in C2), number of comorbidities (p = 0.008; more C2 patients had ≥ 2) and hospital length of stay (p = 0.006; C1 patients stayed longer). There were no between-cluster differences in SDU length of stay, or mortality. Three different clusters of VS presentations for CRI were identified. Clusters varied on age, number of comorbidities and hospital length of stay. Future study is needed to determine if there are common physiologic underpinnings of VS clusters which might inform clinical decision-making when CRI first manifests.
在接受监测的逐步降级护理病房(SDU)患者中,心肺功能不稳定(CRI)有多种病因,且可能表现为生命体征(VS)变化模式。我们探索了使用聚类技术来识别不稳定患者初始CRI阶段(CRI;SDU入院后VS首次超过稳定阈值)的模式,以及不同聚类之间在入院特征和结局方面的差异。以1/20 Hz的频率对心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)进行连续无创监测。我们在165例患者中识别出CRI,采用层次聚类和k均值聚类,测试了几种聚类方案,使用10折交叉验证来确定最佳方案,并评估不同聚类之间在入院特征和结局方面的差异。得出了三个聚类(C):C1)心率和呼吸频率正常/高,血氧饱和度正常(n = 30);C2)心率和呼吸频率正常,血氧饱和度低(n = 103);C3)心率低/正常,呼吸频率低,血氧饱和度正常(n = 32)。基于年龄(p < 0.001;C2中的老年患者)、合并症数量(p = 0.008;更多C2患者有≥2种合并症)和住院时间(p = 0.006;C1患者住院时间更长),聚类之间存在显著差异。在SDU住院时间或死亡率方面,聚类之间没有差异。识别出了CRI的三种不同生命体征表现聚类。聚类在年龄、合并症数量和住院时间方面存在差异。需要进一步研究以确定生命体征聚类是否存在共同的生理基础,这可能在CRI首次出现时为临床决策提供参考。