Skielboe Ane Katrine, Bandholm Thomas Quaade, Hakmann Stine, Mourier Malene, Kallemose Thomas, Dixen Ulrik
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager & Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager & Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0170060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170060. eCollection 2017.
Physical activity at moderate-high intensity is recommended to prevent lifestyle diseases. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at risk of a sedentary lifestyle due to fear of exercise-induced episodes of atrial fibrillation. The burden of arrhythmia can be reduced by physical exercise. The effect of exercise intensity on burden of atrial fibrillation needs to be studied further.
In a 12-week randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation were allocated to perform exercise at either low intensity or high intensity (50% and 80% of maximal perceived exertion, respectively). Primary outcome was burden of AF measured by daily electrocardiography-reporting during 12 weeks. Secondarily, change in maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and 1-year hospitalization was compared between low and high intensity exercise. Sixty-three patients completed the follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analysis, we found no statistical difference in burden of atrial fibrillation between low and high intensity exercise (incidence rate ratio 0.742, 95% CI 0.29-1.91, P = 0.538). No serious adverse events were reported and there was no difference in hospitalization between the two exercise groups. Both exercise groups improved significantly in peak VO2 (low intensity: 3.62 mL O2/kg/min, SD 3.77; high intensity: 2.87 mL O2/kg/min, SD 4.98), with no statistical difference between-groups (mean difference: 0.76 mL O2/kg/min, 95% CI -3.22-1.7).
High intensity physical exercise was not superior to low intensity physical exercise in reducing burden of atrial fibrillation. HI exercise was well tolerated; no evidence of an increased risk was found for HI compared to LI exercise. Larger studies are required to further prove our findings.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01817998.
建议进行中高强度体育活动以预防生活方式疾病。房颤患者因担心运动诱发房颤发作而有久坐生活方式的风险。体育锻炼可减轻心律失常的负担。运动强度对房颤负担的影响有待进一步研究。
在一项为期12周的随机对照试验中,76例阵发性/持续性房颤患者被分配进行低强度或高强度运动(分别为最大感知运动强度的50%和80%)。主要结局是通过12周内每日心电图报告测量的房颤负担。其次,比较低强度和高强度运动之间最大摄氧量(峰值VO2)的变化和1年住院率。63例患者完成了随访。在意向性分析中,我们发现低强度和高强度运动之间房颤负担没有统计学差异(发病率比值0.742,95%可信区间0.29 - 1.91,P = 0.538)。未报告严重不良事件,两组之间住院率无差异。两个运动组的峰值VO2均有显著改善(低强度:3.62 mL O2/kg/min,标准差3.77;高强度:2.87 mL O2/kg/min,标准差4.98),组间无统计学差异(平均差异:0.76 mL O2/kg/min,95%可信区间 - 3.22 - 1.7)。
在减轻房颤负担方面,高强度体育锻炼并不优于低强度体育锻炼。高强度运动耐受性良好;与低强度运动相比,未发现高强度运动风险增加的证据。需要更大规模的研究来进一步证实我们的发现。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01817998。