Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂选择性和剂量方案对心力衰竭患者预后的影响。来自 MECKI 评分数据库的见解。

Prognostic role of β-blocker selectivity and dosage regimens in heart failure patients. Insights from the MECKI score database.

机构信息

IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;19(7):904-914. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.775. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

AIMS

The use of β-blockers represents a milestone in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Few studies have compared β-blockers in HFrEF, and there is little data on the effects of different doses. The present study aimed to investigate in a large database of HFrEF patients (MECKI score database) the association of β-blocker treatment with a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation, addressing the role of β-selectivity and dosage regimens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 5242 HFrEF patients, we investigated the role of: (i) β-blocker treatment vs. non-β-blocker treatment, (ii) β1-/β2-receptor-blockers vs. β1-selective blockers, and (iii) daily β-blocker dose. Patients were followed for 3.58 years, and 1101 events (18.3%) were observed; 4435 patients (86.8%) were on β-blockers, while 807 (13.2%) were not. At 5 years, β-blocker-patients showed a better outcome than non-β-blocker-subjects [hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, P < 0.0001], while also considering potential confounders. A comparable prognosis was observed at 5 years in the β1-/β2-receptor-blocker (n = 2219) vs. β1-selective group (n = 2216) (HR 0.95, P = ns). A better prognosis was observed in high-dose (>2 5 mg carvedilol equivalent daily dose, n = 1005) patients than in both medium dose (12.5-25 mg, n = 1431) and low dose (<12.5 mg, n = 1960) (HR 1.97, P < 0.001; HR 1.95, P = 0.001, respectively), with no differences between the last two groups (HR 0.84, P = ns).

CONCLUSION

In a large population of chronic HFrEF patients, β-blockers were associated with a more favourable prognosis without any difference between β1- and β2-receptor-blockers vs. β1-selective blockers. A better outcome was observed in subjects receiving a high daily dose.

摘要

目的

β受体阻滞剂的应用是射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)治疗的一个里程碑。很少有研究比较 HFrEF 中的β受体阻滞剂,而且关于不同剂量的效果的数据也很少。本研究旨在通过 MECKI 评分数据库中的大量 HFrEF 患者数据库,调查β受体阻滞剂治疗与心血管死亡、紧急心脏移植或左心室辅助装置植入的复合结局之间的关联,并探讨β受体选择性和剂量方案的作用。

方法和结果

在 5242 例 HFrEF 患者中,我们研究了以下因素的作用:(i)β受体阻滞剂治疗与非β受体阻滞剂治疗,(ii)β1/β2 受体阻滞剂与β1 选择性阻滞剂,以及(iii)每日β受体阻滞剂剂量。患者随访 3.58 年,观察到 1101 例事件(18.3%);4435 例患者(86.8%)接受β受体阻滞剂治疗,807 例(13.2%)未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。在 5 年内,β受体阻滞剂组的患者预后优于非β受体阻滞剂组[风险比(HR)0.48,P<0.0001],即使考虑到潜在的混杂因素也是如此。在β1/β2 受体阻滞剂(n=2219)与β1 选择性组(n=2216)中,5 年内观察到相似的预后(HR 0.95,P=ns)。与中剂量(12.5-25mg,n=1431)和低剂量(<12.5mg,n=1960)相比,高剂量(>25mg 卡维地洛等效日剂量,n=1005)患者的预后更好(HR 1.97,P<0.001;HR 1.95,P=0.001),后两组之间无差异(HR 0.84,P=ns)。

结论

在一大群慢性 HFrEF 患者中,β受体阻滞剂与更有利的预后相关,β1 受体和β2 受体阻滞剂与β1 选择性阻滞剂之间没有差异。接受高日剂量的患者预后更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验