Moore Hunter B, Winfield Robert D, Aibiki Mayuki, Neal Matthew D
*University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado †University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas ‡Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan §University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Shock. 2017 Aug;48(2):159-167. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000854.
Coagulopathy is a common and vexing clinical problem in critically ill patients. Recently, major advances focused on the treatment of coagulopathy in trauma and sepsis have emerged. However, the targeting of coagulopathy with blood product transfusion and drugs directed at attenuating the physiologic response to these conditions has major potential risk to the patient. Therefore, the identification of coagulopathy as a clinical target is an area of uncertainty and controversy. To analyze the state of the science regarding coagulopathy in critical illness, a symposium addressing the problem was organized at the 39th annual meeting of the Shock Society in the summer of 2016. This manuscript synthesizes the viewpoints of the four expert panelists at the debate and presents an overview of the potential positive and negative consequences of targeting coagulopathy in trauma and sepsis.
凝血功能障碍是重症患者常见且棘手的临床问题。近年来,在创伤和脓毒症凝血功能障碍的治疗方面取得了重大进展。然而,通过输血制品以及使用旨在减轻机体对这些病症生理反应的药物来针对凝血功能障碍进行治疗,对患者具有重大潜在风险。因此,将凝血功能障碍确定为临床治疗靶点是一个存在不确定性和争议的领域。为分析危重病中凝血功能障碍的科学现状,2016年夏天在休克协会第39届年会上组织了一次针对该问题的专题研讨会。本文综合了辩论中四位专家小组成员的观点,并概述了在创伤和脓毒症中针对凝血功能障碍治疗可能产生的正负两方面后果。