Suppr超能文献

罗哌卡因联合芬太尼与单用罗哌卡因用于急性带状疱疹管理的连续硬膜外输注的镇痛效果比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine with Fentanyl and Ropivacaine Alone in Continuous Epidural Infusion for Acute Herpes Zoster Management: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyungheedae Road 23, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 02447, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Gurodong Road 148, Guro-Gu, Seoul 08308, Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jan 8;56(1):22. doi: 10.3390/medicina56010022.

Abstract

: Currently, few studies have reported the effects of opioids during continuous epidural infusion (CEI) to control pain owing to herpes zoster (HZ). This study aimed to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of epidural opioids in the treatment of acute HZ pain. : We reviewed medical records of 105 patients who were divided into two groups: R group (CEI with ropivacaine) and RF group (CEI with ropivacaine and fentanyl). Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for 6 months after the procedures. We compared the percentage of patients with complete remission in each group. We investigated the complication rates during CEI. : No significant differences in the NRS scores were observed between the two groups in the 6-month period. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for patients included in the complete remission was 0.6 times lower in the RF group than in the R group (95% confidence interval: 0.22-1.71, = 0.35). The OR for complications during CEI was higher in the RF group than in the R group. However, the difference was not statistically significant. : No difference was observed in the management of HZ pain and the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia between the two groups. The incidence of complications tended to be higher in the RF group than in the R group.

摘要

: 目前,由于带状疱疹(HZ),很少有研究报告连续硬膜外输注(CEI)中阿片类药物对控制疼痛的影响。本研究旨在回顾性比较硬膜外阿片类药物治疗急性 HZ 疼痛的效果。 : 我们回顾了 105 名患者的病历,将他们分为两组:R 组(CEI 加罗哌卡因)和 RF 组(CEI 加罗哌卡因和芬太尼)。术后 6 个月采用数字评分量表(NRS)评分评估临床疗效。我们比较了每组完全缓解的患者比例。我们调查了 CEI 期间的并发症发生率。 : 在 6 个月期间,两组患者的 NRS 评分无显著差异。RF 组完全缓解的调整优势比(OR)比 R 组低 0.6 倍(95%置信区间:0.22-1.71, = 0.35)。CEI 期间并发症的 OR 在 RF 组高于 R 组。然而,差异无统计学意义。 : 在 HZ 疼痛的管理和带状疱疹后神经痛的预防方面,两组之间没有差异。RF 组并发症的发生率似乎高于 R 组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84c5/7022602/fa2fac6a8cc2/medicina-56-00022-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验