PhD student in Psychology, University of Algarve, Portugal; Research Center for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve, Portugal.
Research Center for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve, Portugal.
Psychiatry Res. 2017 May;251:298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
The present study examined the factor structure of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in a sample of older Portuguese adults using a cross-validation approach. Design is a cross-sectional. A convenience sample of 204 community-dwelling older adults (M=70.05, SD=7.15) were included. The global sleep quality (GSQ) score ranged from 0 to 18 with a mean of 5.98 (SD±3.45). The distribution showed that gender and perception of oneself as healthy influences GSQ in this sample. Cronbach's α was 0.69, but increased to 0.70 if the "use of sleep medication" component was deleted. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated two factor model is better than one factor, and a model fit with good indices (chi-square=8.649, df=8, p=0.373). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the single factor, two factor, and three factor models, with and without the "use of sleep medications" component. The best model was the 3-factor model without the "use of sleep medications" component (chi-square=1.214, df=6, GFI=0.997, AGFI=0.918, CFI=0.986, RMSEA=0.046). The adaptation of the model is similar to the original model, with the only change being the exclusion of the "use of medications to sleep" component. We suggest using that component as a complementary qualitative assessment of health.
本研究采用交叉验证方法,考察了匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)在葡萄牙老年人群体中的因子结构。研究设计为横断面研究。共纳入 204 名社区居住的老年成年人(M=70.05,SD=7.15)。总体睡眠质量(GSQ)评分范围为 0 至 18,平均得分为 5.98(SD±3.45)。分布表明,性别和对自身健康的认知会影响该样本中的 GSQ。Cronbach's α 为 0.69,但如果删除“使用睡眠药物”这一成分,其值会增加至 0.70。探索性因素分析(EFA)表明,两因素模型优于单因素模型,且一个具有良好指标的模型拟合(卡方=8.649,自由度=8,p=0.373)。在单因素、两因素和三因素模型中,分别进行了包含和不包含“使用睡眠药物”成分的验证性因素分析(CFA)。最佳模型是不包含“使用睡眠药物”成分的三因素模型(卡方=1.214,自由度=6,GFI=0.997,AGFI=0.918,CFI=0.986,RMSEA=0.046)。模型的适配性与原始模型相似,唯一的变化是删除了“使用药物助眠”这一成分。我们建议将该成分作为健康的补充性定性评估。