Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 11 Mandalay Road 308232, Singapore.
Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht POB 616 6022 MD, The Netherlands.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 20;16(23):4590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234590.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a widely used measure for assessing sleep impairment. Although it was developed as a unidimensional instrument, there is much debate that it contains multidimensional latent constructs. This study aims to investigate the dimensionality of the underlying factor structure of the PSQI in a multi-ethnic working population in Singapore. The PSQI was administered on three occasions (baseline, 3 months and 12 months) to full-time employees participating in a workplace cohort study. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) investigated the latent factor structure of the scale at each timepoint. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the model identified by EFA, and additionally evaluated it against a single factor and a three-factor model. The EFA identified a two-factor model with similar internal consistency and goodness-of-fit across each timepoint. In the CFA, the two- and three-factor models were both superior to the unidimensional model. The two- and three-factor models of the PSQI were reliable, consistent and provided similar goodness-of-fit over time, and both models were superior to the unidimensional measure. We recommend using the two-factor model to assess sleep characteristics in working populations in Singapore, given that it performs as well as the three-factor model and is simpler compared to the latter.
匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)是一种广泛用于评估睡眠障碍的测量工具。尽管它是作为一种单维度的工具开发的,但有很多争论认为它包含多维潜在结构。本研究旨在调查新加坡多民族工作人群中 PSQI 潜在因子结构的维度。PSQI 在参与工作场所队列研究的全职员工中进行了三次测试(基线、3 个月和 12 个月)。探索性因子分析(EFA)在每个时间点研究了该量表的潜在因子结构。验证性因子分析(CFA)评估了 EFA 确定的模型,并针对单因素模型和三因素模型进行了评估。EFA 在每个时间点都确定了具有相似内部一致性和拟合优度的两因素模型。在 CFA 中,两因素和三因素模型均优于单维度模型。PSQI 的两因素和三因素模型在时间上都是可靠的、一致的,且具有相似的拟合优度,而且这两种模型都优于单维度测量。鉴于两因素模型与三因素模型一样有效,且与后者相比更为简单,因此我们建议在评估新加坡工作人群的睡眠特征时使用两因素模型。