Sun Yu, You Wen, Almeida Fabio, Estabrooks Paul, Davy Brenda
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):404-421.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.016.
Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern. With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program, there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice. However, the cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown.
The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to synthesize the effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent (dietitian vs non-dietitian) and channel (in-person vs technology-delivered).
English and full-text research articles published up to July 2015 were identified using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Education Resources Information Center, CAB Direct, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Sixty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Most employed both dietary and physical activity intervention components (four of 69 were diet-only interventions). Changes in weight, fasting and 2-hour blood glucose concentration, and hemoglobin A1c were extracted from each article. Heterogeneity was measured by the I index, and study-specific effect sizes or mean differences were pooled using a random effects model when heterogeneity was confirmed.
Participants receiving intervention with nutrition education experienced a reduction of 2.07 kg (95% CI 1.52 to 2.62; P<0.001; I=90.99%, 95% CI 88.61% to 92.87%) in weight at 12 months with effect sizes over time ranging from small (0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.30; P=0.012; I= 86.83%, 95% CI 80.42% to 91.14%) to medium (0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.82; P<0.001; I=98.75%, 95% CI 98.52% to 98.94). Effect sizes for 2-hour blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c level changes ranged from small to medium. The meta-regression analysis revealed a larger relative weight loss in dietitian-delivered interventions than in those delivered by nondietitians (full sample: -1.0 kg; US subsample: -2.4 kg), and did not find statistical evidence that the delivery channel was an important predictor of weight loss. The average cost per kilogram weight loss ranged from $34.06 over 6 months to $1,005.36 over 12 months. The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians, although few studies reported costs.
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes. Dietitian-delivered interventions, compared with those delivered by other personnel, achieved greater weight reduction. No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels.
2型糖尿病是一个重大的公共卫生问题。随着糖尿病预防计划的完成,大量研究试图将这一证据基础转化为实践。然而,这些适应性干预措施的成本、效果和成本效益尚不清楚。
本系统评价的目的是进行全面的荟萃分析,以综合生活方式糖尿病预防干预措施的效果、成本和成本效益,并比较干预实施者(营养师与非营养师)和渠道(面对面与技术提供)的效果。
使用Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、教育资源信息中心、CAB Direct、Science Direct和谷歌学术搜索,检索截至2015年7月发表的英文和全文研究文章。69项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究同时采用了饮食和身体活动干预成分(69项中有4项是仅饮食干预)。从每篇文章中提取体重、空腹和2小时血糖浓度以及糖化血红蛋白的变化。异质性通过I指数测量,当确认存在异质性时,使用随机效应模型汇总研究特异性效应大小或均值差异。
接受营养教育干预的参与者在12个月时体重减轻了2.07kg(95%CI 1.52至2.62;P<0.001;I=90.99%,95%CI 88.61%至92.87%),随着时间推移效应大小从小(0.17,95%CI 0.04至0.30;P=0.012;I=86.83%,95%CI 80.42%至91.14%)到中等(0.65,95%CI 0.49至0.82;P<0.001;I=98.75%,95%CI 98.52%至98.94)。2小时血糖和糖化血红蛋白水平变化的效应大小从小到中等。荟萃回归分析显示,营养师实施的干预措施比非营养师实施的干预措施相对体重减轻更大(全样本:-1.0kg;美国子样本:-2.4kg),且未发现有统计学证据表明实施渠道是体重减轻的重要预测因素。每减轻1千克体重的平均成本从6个月内的34.06美元到12个月内的1005.36美元不等。营养师实施的每位参与者的干预成本低于非营养师实施的干预成本,尽管很少有研究报告成本。
生活方式干预在减轻体重和改善血糖相关指标方面是有效的。与其他人员实施的干预措施相比,营养师实施的干预措施能实现更大程度的体重减轻。不同实施渠道未发现一致的趋势。