Evans Rhiannon, Brown Rachel, Rees Gwyther, Smith Philip
DECIPHer Cardiff University UK.
WISERD Cardiff University UK.
Br Educ Res J. 2017 Feb;43(1):68-94. doi: 10.1002/berj.3252. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Looked-after children and young people (LACYP) are educationally disadvantaged compared to the general population. A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions aimed at LACYP aged ≤18 years. Restrictions were not placed on delivery setting or delivery agent. Intervention outcomes were: academic skills; academic achievement and grade completion; special education status; homework completion; school attendance, suspension, and drop-out; number of school placements; teacher-student relationships; school behaviour; and academic attitudes. Fifteen studies reporting on 12 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Nine interventions demonstrated tentative impacts. However, evidence of effectiveness could not be ascertained due to variable methodological quality, as appraised by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Theoretical and methodological recommendations are provided to enhance the development and evaluation of educational interventions.
与普通人群相比,受照料儿童和青少年(LACYP)在教育方面处于劣势。我们对评估针对18岁及以下LACYP的干预措施的随机对照试验进行了系统综述。对实施环境或实施主体未设限制。干预结果包括:学术技能;学业成绩和年级完成情况;特殊教育状况;家庭作业完成情况;学校出勤、停学和辍学情况;学校安置次数;师生关系;学校行为;以及学术态度。15项报告12种干预措施的研究符合纳入标准。9种干预措施显示出初步影响。然而,根据Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估,由于方法学质量参差不齐,无法确定有效性证据。我们提供了理论和方法学建议,以加强教育干预措施的开发和评估。