School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan;33(1):203-210. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001870.
Bogdanis, GC, Donti, O, Tsolakis, C, Smilios, I, and Bishop, DJ. Intermittent but not continuous static stretching improves subsequent vertical jump performance in flexibility-trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res 33(1): 203-210, 2019-This study examined changes in countermovement jump (CMJ) height after an intermittent or a continuous static stretching protocol of equal total duration. Sixteen male, elite-level gymnasts performed 90 seconds of intermittent (3 × 30 seconds with 30 seconds rest) or continuous stretching (90 seconds) of the quadriceps muscle. A single-leg stretching and jumping design was used, with the contralateral limb serving as a control. The same individuals performed both conditions with alternate legs in a randomized, counterbalanced order. One-leg CMJ height was measured for the stretched and the control leg after warm-up, immediately after stretching, and at regular intervals for 10 minutes after stretching. Range of motion (ROM) of the hip and knee joints was measured before, after, and 10 minutes poststretching. Compared with the control leg, intermittent stretching increased CMJ height by 8.1 ± 2.0%, 4 minutes into recovery (2.2 ± 2.0 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.4 cm, p = 0.001), whereas continuous stretching decreased CMJ height by 17.5 ± 3.3% immediately after (-2.9 ± 1.7 cm, 95% CI: -2.0 to -3.7 cm, p = 0.001) and by 12.0 ± 2.7% 1 minute after stretching (-2.2 ± 2.1 cm, 95% CI: -1.2 to -3.2 cm, p = 0.001). The increases in hip (2.9 and 3.6°, p = 0.001. d = 2.4) and knee joint ROM (5.1 and 6.1°, p = 0.001. d = 0.85) after the intermittent and continuous stretching protocols were not different. The opposite effects of intermittent vs. continuous stretching on subsequent CMJ performance suggests that stretching mode is an important variable when examining the acute effects of static stretching on performance in flexibility-trained athletes.
Bogdanis, GC, Donti, O, Tsolakis, C, Smilios, I, 和 Bishop, DJ. 间歇性而非连续性的静力拉伸可提高柔韧性训练运动员的后续垂直跳跃表现。J 力量与体能研究 33(1): 203-210, 2019- 本研究检测了间歇性和连续性等总时长的静力拉伸方案后,反跳式纵跳(CMJ)高度的变化。16 名男性精英体操运动员对股四头肌进行 90 秒的间歇性(3x30 秒,休息 30 秒)或连续性拉伸。使用单腿拉伸和跳跃设计,对侧腿作为对照。相同个体以随机、交替的方式用交替腿完成两种条件。在热身、拉伸后即刻和拉伸后 10 分钟的各个时间点测量拉伸和对照腿的单腿 CMJ 高度。在拉伸前后和拉伸后 10 分钟测量髋关节和膝关节的活动度(ROM)。与对照腿相比,间歇性拉伸在恢复 4 分钟时使 CMJ 高度增加 8.1±2.0%(2.2±2.0cm,95%置信区间[CI]:1.0-3.4cm,p=0.001),而连续性拉伸则使 CMJ 高度立即降低 17.5±3.3%(-2.9±1.7cm,95%CI:-2.0 至-3.7cm,p=0.001),1 分钟后降低 12.0±2.7%(-2.2±2.1cm,95%CI:-1.2 至-3.2cm,p=0.001)。在间歇和连续拉伸方案后,髋关节(2.9 和 3.6°,p=0.001. d=2.4)和膝关节 ROM(5.1 和 6.1°,p=0.001. d=0.85)的增加没有差异。间歇性和连续性拉伸对后续 CMJ 表现的相反影响表明,在检查柔韧性训练运动员的静态拉伸对表现的急性影响时,拉伸模式是一个重要的变量。