Rosenberg Avi Z, Kopp Jeffrey B
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Kidney Disease Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):502-517. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05960616. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of kidney disease worldwide. The presumed etiology of primary FSGS is a plasma factor with responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy and a risk of recurrence after kidney transplant-important disease characteristics. In contrast, adaptive FSGS is associated with excessive nephron workload due to increased body size, reduced nephron capacity, or single glomerular hyperfiltration associated with certain diseases. Additional etiologies are now recognized as drivers of FSGS: high-penetrance genetic FSGS due to mutations in one of nearly 40 genes, virus-associated FSGS, and medication-associated FSGS. Emerging data support the identification of a sixth category: APOL1 risk allele-associated FSGS in individuals with sub-Saharan ancestry. The classification of a particular patient with FSGS relies on integration of findings from clinical history, laboratory testing, kidney biopsy, and in some patients, genetic testing. The kidney biopsy can be helpful, with clues provided by features on light microscopy (, glomerular size, histologic variant of FSGS, microcystic tubular changes, and tubular hypertrophy), immunofluorescence (, to rule out other primary glomerulopathies), and electron microscopy (, extent of podocyte foot process effacement, podocyte microvillous transformation, and tubuloreticular inclusions). A complete assessment of renal histology is important for establishing the parenchymal setting of segmental glomerulosclerosis, distinguishing FSGS associated with one of many other glomerular diseases from the clinical-pathologic syndrome of FSGS. Genetic testing is beneficial in particular clinical settings. Identifying the etiology of FSGS guides selection of therapy and provides prognostic insight. Much progress has been made in our understanding of FSGS, but important outstanding issues remain, including the identity of the plasma factor believed to be responsible for primary FSGS, the value of routine implementation of genetic testing, and the identification of more effective and less toxic therapeutic interventions for FSGS.
局灶节段性肾小球硬化(FSGS)是全球范围内肾脏疾病的主要病因。原发性FSGS的推测病因是一种对免疫抑制治疗有反应且肾移植后有复发风险的血浆因子,这是重要的疾病特征。相比之下,适应性FSGS与因体型增大、肾单位容量减少或与某些疾病相关的单个肾小球超滤增加导致的肾单位工作负荷过重有关。现在已认识到其他病因是FSGS的驱动因素:近40个基因之一发生突变导致的高 penetrance 遗传性FSGS、病毒相关性FSGS和药物相关性FSGS。新出现的数据支持识别出第六类:撒哈拉以南血统个体中与APOL1风险等位基因相关的FSGS。特定FSGS患者的分类依赖于临床病史、实验室检查、肾活检结果的整合,在某些患者中还依赖于基因检测。肾活检可能会有帮助,光镜特征(如肾小球大小、FSGS的组织学变体、微囊性肾小管改变和肾小管肥大)、免疫荧光(如排除其他原发性肾小球病)和电子显微镜(如足细胞足突消失的程度、足细胞微绒毛转化和管状网状包涵体)可提供线索。对肾脏组织学进行全面评估对于确定节段性肾小球硬化的实质背景、将与许多其他肾小球疾病之一相关的FSGS与FSGS临床病理综合征区分开来很重要。基因检测在特定临床情况下有益。确定FSGS的病因可指导治疗选择并提供预后见解。我们对FSGS的理解已取得很大进展,但仍存在重要的未解决问题,包括被认为是原发性FSGS病因的血浆因子的身份、基因检测常规实施的价值以及确定更有效且毒性更小的FSGS治疗干预措施。