Suppr超能文献

II期鼻咽癌同步放化疗与单纯放疗的比较:2138例患者的系统评价和Meta分析

Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of 2138 Patients.

作者信息

Xu Cheng, Zhang Li-He, Chen Yu-Pei, Liu Xu, Zhou Guan-Qun, Lin Ai-Hua, Sun Ying, Ma Jun

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2017 Jan 15;8(2):287-297. doi: 10.7150/jca.17317. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

To explore the value of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) compared to radiotherapy (RT) alone which includes two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). All topic-related comparative articles were identified by a comprehensive search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CBMdisc). The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Secondary outcomes were grade 3-4 acute toxicity events. We performed subgroup analysis of CRT versus 2D-RT/IMRT alone to investigate the optimal modality. Sensitivity analysis focused on CRT versus IMRT alone was used to assess stability of the study results. Eleven comparative studies (2138 patients) were eligible. CRT had significantly higher OS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.45-0.98, = 0.04) and LRRFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46-0.80, = 0.0003) than RT alone, but no significant difference was observed in DMFS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.52-1.31, = 0.41). Meanwhile, CRT was associated with higher frequencies of grade 3-4 leukopenia, mucositis and nausea ( = 0.005, 0.03, < 0.0001, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that IMRT alone could achieve equivalent OS, LRRFS and DMFS compared to CRT ( = 0.14, 0.06, 0.89, respectively). Significant value was only observed in LRRFS for CRT compared to 2D-RT alone ( = 0.01). Sensitivity analysis for the comparison of CRT and IMRT alone demonstrated generally stable outcomes, in support of the final conclusions. In the treatment of patients with stage II NPC, CRT was better than 2D-RT alone with significant benefit in LRRFS. IMRT alone was superior to CRT with equivalent survival outcomes and fewer grade 3-4 acute toxicities.

摘要

为探讨与单纯放疗(RT)(包括二维放疗(2D-RT)和调强放疗(IMRT))相比,同步放化疗(CRT)在II期鼻咽癌(NPC)治疗中的价值。通过全面检索公共数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和CBMdisc)确定所有相关的比较文章。主要结局为总生存期(OS)、局部区域无复发生存期(LRRFS)和远处转移无复发生存期(DMFS)。次要结局为3-4级急性毒性事件。我们对CRT与单纯2D-RT/IMRT进行亚组分析以探究最佳治疗方式。聚焦于CRT与单纯IMRT的敏感性分析用于评估研究结果的稳定性。11项比较研究(2138例患者)符合要求。与单纯放疗相比,CRT的OS(风险比(HR)=0.67,95%置信区间(CI)=0.45-0.98,P=0.04)和LRRFS(HR=0.61,95%CI=0.46-0.80,P=0.0003)显著更高,但DMFS无显著差异(HR=0.83,95%CI=0.52-1.31,P=0.41)。同时,CRT与3-4级白细胞减少、黏膜炎和恶心的更高发生率相关(P分别为0.005、0.03、<0.0001)。亚组分析显示,与CRT相比,单纯IMRT可实现相当的OS、LRRFS和DMFS(P分别为0.14、0.06、0.89)。与单纯2D-RT相比,仅在CRT的LRRFS方面观察到显著价值(P=0.01)。CRT与单纯IMRT比较的敏感性分析显示结果总体稳定,支持最终结论。在II期NPC患者的治疗中,CRT优于单纯2D-RT,在LRRFS方面有显著益处。单纯IMRT优于CRT,生存结局相当且3-4级急性毒性更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/5327378/80b48af31d12/jcav08p0287g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验