Watson Julie A, Ensink Jeroen H J, Ramos Monica, Benelli Prisca, Holdsworth Elizabeth, Dreibelbis Robert, Cumming Oliver
Department for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Save the Children, London, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 May;22(5):526-538. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12861. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
To synthesise evidence on the effect of handwashing promotion interventions targeting children, on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infection and handwashing behaviour, in low- and middle-income country settings.
A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching eight databases, and reference lists were hand-searched for additional articles. Studies were reviewed for inclusion according to pre-defined inclusion criteria and the quality of all studies was assessed.
Eight studies were included in this review: seven cluster-randomised controlled trials and one cluster non-randomised controlled trial. All eight studies targeted children aged 5-12 attending primary school but were heterogeneous for both the type of intervention and the reported outcomes so results were synthesised qualitatively. None of the studies were of high quality and the large majority were at high risk of bias. The reported effect of child-targeted handwashing interventions on our outcomes of interest varied between studies. Of the different interventions reported, no one approach to promoting handwashing among children appeared most effective.
Our review found very few studies that evaluated handwashing interventions targeting children and all had various methodological limitations. It is plausible that interventions which succeed in changing children's handwashing practices will lead to significant health impacts given that much of the attributable disease burden is concentrated in that age group. The current paucity of evidence in this area, however, does not permit any recommendations to be made as to the most effective route to increasing handwashing with soap practice among children in LMIC.
综合关于在低收入和中等收入国家环境中,针对儿童的洗手促进干预措施对腹泻、土壤传播的蠕虫感染及洗手行为影响的证据。
通过检索八个数据库对文献进行系统综述,并人工检索参考文献列表以获取更多文章。根据预先定义的纳入标准对研究进行审查,并评估所有研究的质量。
本综述纳入了八项研究:七项整群随机对照试验和一项整群非随机对照试验。所有八项研究均针对5至12岁的小学生,但干预类型和报告的结果均存在异质性,因此对结果进行了定性综合分析。没有一项研究质量高,绝大多数研究存在高偏倚风险。针对儿童的洗手干预措施对我们感兴趣的结果的报告效果在不同研究中有所不同。在报告的不同干预措施中,没有一种促进儿童洗手的方法显得最为有效。
我们的综述发现,评估针对儿童的洗手干预措施的研究很少,且所有研究都存在各种方法学局限性。鉴于大部分可归因疾病负担集中在该年龄组,成功改变儿童洗手习惯的干预措施可能会对健康产生重大影响。然而,目前该领域证据匮乏,无法就低收入和中等收入国家增加儿童用肥皂洗手行为的最有效途径提出任何建议。