Gale Catharine R, Ritchie Stuart J, Cooper Cyrus, Starr John M, Deary Ian J
Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1289-1295. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14787. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
To investigate whether poorer cognitive ability is a risk factor for development of physical frailty and whether this risk varies according to cognitive domain.
Prospective longitudinal study with 6-year follow-up.
Edinburgh, Scotland.
Members of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (N = 594).
Frailty was assessed at ages 70 and 76 using the Fried criteria. Cognitive function was assessed at age 70, 73, and 76. Factor score estimates were derived for baseline level of and change in four cognitive domains: visuospatial ability, memory, processing speed, and crystallized cognitive ability.
Higher baseline levels of processing speed, memory, visuospatial ability and crystallized ability at age 70, and less decline in speed, memory, and crystallized ability were associated with less risk of becoming physically frail by age 76. When all cognitive domains were modelled together, processing speed was the only domain associated with frailty risk, for a standard deviation (SD) increment in initial level of processing speed, the risk of frailty was 47% less (0.53 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33-0.85) after adjustment for age, sex, baseline frailty status, social class, depressive symptoms, number of chronic physical diseases, levels of inflammatory biomarkers, and other cognitive factor score estimates; for a SD increment in processing speed change (less decline) risk of frailty was 74% less (RRR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.16-0.42). When additional analyses were conducted using a single test of processing speed that did not require fast motor responses (inspection time), results were similar.
The speed with which older adults process information and the rate at which this declines over time may be an important indicator of the risk of physical frailty.
研究较差的认知能力是否为身体虚弱发展的危险因素,以及该风险是否因认知领域而异。
为期6年随访的前瞻性纵向研究。
苏格兰爱丁堡。
1936年洛锡安出生队列的成员(N = 594)。
在70岁和76岁时使用弗里德标准评估虚弱状况。在70岁、73岁和76岁时评估认知功能。得出四个认知领域(视觉空间能力、记忆、处理速度和晶态认知能力)的基线水平及变化的因子得分估计值。
70岁时处理速度、记忆、视觉空间能力和晶态能力的基线水平较高,以及速度、记忆和晶态能力下降较少,与76岁时身体虚弱风险较低相关。当对所有认知领域进行联合建模时,处理速度是唯一与虚弱风险相关的领域,对于处理速度初始水平标准差(SD)的增加,在调整年龄、性别、基线虚弱状态、社会阶层、抑郁症状、慢性身体疾病数量、炎症生物标志物水平和其他认知因子得分估计值后,虚弱风险降低47%(0.53,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.33 - 0.85);对于处理速度变化(下降较少)标准差的增加,虚弱风险降低74%(相对风险降低率 = 0.26,95% CI = 0.16 - 0.42)。当使用一项不需要快速运动反应的处理速度单项测试(检查时间)进行额外分析时,结果相似。
老年人处理信息的速度及其随时间下降的速率可能是身体虚弱风险的重要指标。