Sawdon M A, Whitehouse K, Finn G M, McLachlan J C, Murray D
School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Queen's Campus, University Boulevard, Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK.
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 1;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0891-6.
The concept of professionalism is complex and subjective and relies on expert judgements. Currently, there are no existing objective measures of professionalism in anaesthesia. However, it is possible that at least some elements of professionalism may be indicated by objective measures. A number of studies have suggested that conscientiousness as a trait is a significant contributor to professionalism.
A 'Conscientiousness Index' (CI) was developed by collation of routinely collected data from tasks expected to be carried out by anaesthetic trainees such as punctual submission of holiday and 'not-on-call' requests, attendance at audit meetings, timely submission of completed appraisal documentation and sickness/absence notifications. The CI consists of a sum of points deducted from a baseline of 50 for non-completion of these objective and measurable behaviours related to conscientiousness. This was correlated with consultants' formal and informal subjective measures of professionalism in those trainees. Informal, subjective measures of professionalism consisted of a 'Professionalism Index' (PI). The PI consisted of a score developed from consultants' expert, subjective views of professionalism for those trainees. Formal, subjective measures of professionalism consisted of a score derived from comments made by consultants in College Tutor feedback forms on their views on the professionalism of those trainees (College Tutor feedback; CT). The PI and CT scores were correlated against the CI using a Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
There was a negative, but not statistically significant, relationship between the CI and formal, subjective measures of professionalism; CT scores (r = -0.341, p = 0.06), but no correlation between CI and consultants informal views of trainees' professionalism; the PI scores (r = -0.059, p = 0.759).
This may be due the 'failure to fail' phenomenon due to the high stakes nature of raising concerns of professionalism in postgraduate healthcare professionals or may be that the precision of the tool may be insufficient to distinguish between trainees who generally show highly professional behaviour. Future development of the tool may need to include more of the sub-facets of conscientiousness. Independently of a relationship with the construct of professionalism, a measure of conscientiousness might be of interest to future employers.
专业精神的概念复杂且主观,依赖于专家判断。目前,麻醉领域尚无现有的客观专业精神衡量指标。然而,至少某些专业精神要素可能可由客观指标体现。多项研究表明,尽责性作为一种特质是专业精神的重要贡献因素。
通过整理麻醉实习医生预期执行任务的常规收集数据来制定“尽责性指数”(CI),这些任务包括准时提交假期和“非值班”申请、参加审核会议、及时提交完整的评估文件以及疾病/缺勤通知。CI由因未完成这些与尽责性相关的客观且可衡量行为而从50分的基线分数中扣除的分数总和组成。这与顾问对这些实习医生专业精神的正式和非正式主观衡量指标相关联。专业精神的非正式主观衡量指标包括“专业精神指数”(PI)。PI由根据顾问对那些实习医生专业精神的专家主观观点得出的分数组成。专业精神的正式主观衡量指标包括从顾问在学院导师反馈表中对那些实习医生专业精神的看法所做评论得出的分数(学院导师反馈;CT)。使用Pearson或Spearman相关系数将PI和CT分数与CI进行相关性分析。
CI与专业精神的正式主观衡量指标之间存在负相关,但无统计学意义;CT分数(r = -0.341,p = 0.06),但CI与顾问对实习医生专业精神的非正式看法之间无相关性;PI分数(r = -0.059,p = 0.759)。
这可能是由于研究生医疗专业人员中提出专业精神问题具有高风险性质而导致的“无法失败”现象,或者可能是该工具的精确性不足以区分通常表现出高度专业行为的实习医生。该工具未来的开发可能需要纳入更多尽责性的子方面。独立于与专业精神结构的关系之外,尽责性的衡量指标可能会引起未来雇主的兴趣。