Wilson Simon John, Newby David E, Dawson Dana, Irving John, Berry Colin
British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Heart. 2017 Apr;103(8):573-580. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309871. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Despite a large volume of evidence supporting the use of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome, there remains major uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of therapy. Clinical trials have varied markedly in the duration of therapy, both across and within trials. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy are superior because the avoidance of atherothrombotic events is counterbalanced by the greater risks of excess major bleeding with apparent increases in all-cause mortality with longer durations. These findings did not show significant heterogeneity according to whether patients had stable or unstable coronary heart disease. Moreover, the potential hazards and benefits may differ when applied to the general broad population of patients encountered in everyday clinical practice who have markedly higher bleeding and atherothrombotic event rates. Clinicians lack definitive information regarding the duration of therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and risk scores do not appear to be sufficiently robust to address these concerns. We believe that there is a pressing need to undertake a broad inclusive safety trial of shorter durations of therapy in real world populations of patients with acute coronary syndrome. The clinical evidence would further inform future research into strategies for personalised medicine.
尽管有大量证据支持在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中使用双联抗血小板治疗,但治疗的最佳持续时间仍存在很大不确定性。临床试验的治疗持续时间差异显著,无论是在不同试验之间还是在同一试验内部。最近的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,较短疗程的双联抗血小板治疗更具优势,因为避免动脉粥样硬化血栓形成事件的益处被严重出血风险增加所抵消,且随着疗程延长全因死亡率明显上升。无论患者患有稳定型还是不稳定型冠心病,这些研究结果均未显示出显著的异质性。此外,应用于日常临床实践中遇到的广大普通患者群体时,潜在的危害和益处可能有所不同,这些患者的出血和动脉粥样硬化血栓形成事件发生率明显更高。临床医生缺乏关于急性冠状动脉综合征患者治疗持续时间的确切信息,而且风险评分似乎也不够可靠,无法解决这些问题。我们认为,迫切需要在急性冠状动脉综合征患者的真实世界人群中开展一项广泛纳入的短疗程治疗安全性试验。临床证据将为未来个性化医疗策略的研究提供进一步信息。