• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后住院期间 P2Y 抑制剂使用的证据-实践差距:来自澳大利亚新的人群水平数据关联的研究结果。

Evidence-practice gaps in P2Y inhibitor use after hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction: findings from a new population-level data linkage in Australia.

机构信息

Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Safer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):249-258. doi: 10.1111/imj.15036.

DOI:10.1111/imj.15036
PMID:32840951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9306967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

P2Y inhibitor therapy is recommended for 12 months in patients hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) unless the bleeding risk is high.

AIMS

To describe real-world use of P2Y inhibitor therapy following AMI hospitalisation.

METHODS

We used population-level linked hospital data to identify all patients discharged from a public hospital with a primary diagnosis of AMI between July 2011 and June 2013 in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. We used dispensing claims to examine dispensing of a P2Y inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor) within 30 days of discharge and multilevel models to identify predictors of post-discharge dispensing and persistence of therapy to 1 year.

RESULTS

We identified 31 848 patients hospitalised for AMI, of whom 56.8% were dispensed a P2Y inhibitor within 30 days of discharge. The proportion of patients with post-discharge dispensing varied between hospitals (interquartile range: 25.0-56.5%), and significant between-hospital variation remained after adjusting for patient characteristics. Patient factors associated with the lowest likelihood of post-discharge dispensing were: having undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (odds ratio (OR): 0.17; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.15-0.20); having oral anticoagulants dispensed 180 days before or 30 days after discharge (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.35-0.44); major bleeding (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61-0.76); or being aged ≥85 years (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.62-0.75). A total of 26.8% of patients who were dispensed a P2Y inhibitor post-discharge discontinued therapy within 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Post-hospitalisation use of P2Y inhibitor therapy in AMI patients is low and varies substantially by hospital of discharge. Our findings suggest strategies addressing both health system (hospital and physician) and patient factors are needed to close this evidence-practice gap.

摘要

背景

除非出血风险高,否则建议对因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的患者使用 P2Y 抑制剂治疗 12 个月。

目的

描述 AMI 住院后 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的实际应用情况。

方法

我们使用人群水平的医院数据,确定了 2011 年 7 月至 2013 年 6 月期间澳大利亚新南威尔士州和维多利亚州因原发性 AMI 出院的所有患者。我们使用配药记录,在出院后 30 天内检查 P2Y 抑制剂(氯吡格雷、普拉格雷或替卡格雷)的配药情况,并使用多层次模型确定出院后配药和治疗持续至 1 年的预测因素。

结果

我们共确定了 31848 例因 AMI 住院的患者,其中 56.8%在出院后 30 天内使用了 P2Y 抑制剂。出院后配药的患者比例在医院之间有所不同(四分位距:25.0-56.5%),在调整患者特征后仍存在显著的医院间差异。与出院后配药可能性最低相关的患者因素包括:接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术(比值比(OR):0.17;95%置信区间(CI):0.15-0.20);在出院前 180 天或出院后 30 天内使用口服抗凝剂(OR:0.39,95%CI:0.35-0.44);大出血(OR:0.68,95%CI:0.61-0.76);或年龄≥85 岁(OR:0.68,95%CI:0.62-0.75)。出院后使用 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的患者中,有 26.8%在 1 年内停止了治疗。

结论

AMI 患者出院后使用 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的比例较低,且出院医院之间差异很大。我们的研究结果表明,需要采取针对卫生系统(医院和医生)和患者因素的策略,以缩小这一证据与实践之间的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/5f7ceee2a1b1/IMJ-52-249-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/55da4ecc6fb7/IMJ-52-249-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/aef58ca5e1cf/IMJ-52-249-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/b5bada6a52e6/IMJ-52-249-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/5f7ceee2a1b1/IMJ-52-249-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/55da4ecc6fb7/IMJ-52-249-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/aef58ca5e1cf/IMJ-52-249-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/b5bada6a52e6/IMJ-52-249-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/9306967/5f7ceee2a1b1/IMJ-52-249-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-practice gaps in P2Y inhibitor use after hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction: findings from a new population-level data linkage in Australia.急性心肌梗死后住院期间 P2Y 抑制剂使用的证据-实践差距:来自澳大利亚新的人群水平数据关联的研究结果。
Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):249-258. doi: 10.1111/imj.15036.
2
Physician and Hospital Utilization of P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Research to Practice Initiative.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中P2Y12抑制剂的医生及医院使用情况:一项来自国家心血管数据注册中心“研究到实践”倡议的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006275. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
Effect of Medication Co-payment Vouchers on P2Y12 Inhibitor Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction: The ARTEMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.药物共付券对心肌梗死患者使用 P2Y12 抑制剂和主要心血管不良事件的影响:ARTEMIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):44-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19791.
4
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016.2008-2016 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板药物初治患者中血小板二磷酸腺苷 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的使用和依从性趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783.
6
Contemporary use of guideline-based higher potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy in patients with moderate-to-high risk non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the Canadian ACS reflective II cross-sectional study.加拿大 ACS 反思 II 横断面研究:基于指南的高活性 P2Y12 受体抑制剂在中高危非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的当代应用。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jun;44(6):839-847. doi: 10.1002/clc.23618. Epub 2021 May 13.
7
In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者在院内使用二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的转换:来自TRANSLATE-ACS研究对当代实践的见解
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):499-508. doi: 10.1177/2048872614564082. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
8
Optimal P2Y12 Inhibitor in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的最佳 P2Y12 抑制剂:网状荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 23;9(10):1036-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.013.
9
A comparison of cangrelor, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中坎格雷洛、普拉格雷、替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Mar;18(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Newer P2Y Inhibitors vs Clopidogrel in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiac Arrest or Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型 P2Y12 抑制剂与氯吡格雷治疗伴心脏骤停或心源性休克的急性心肌梗死:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Jun;97(6):1074-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.02.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistence and Adherence to Cardiovascular Medicines in Australia.澳大利亚心血管药物的坚持和依从性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e030264. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.030264. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
Generating Real-World Evidence on the Quality Use, Benefits and Safety of Medicines in Australia: History, Challenges and a Roadmap for the Future.在澳大利亚生成关于药品质量使用、效益和安全性的真实世界证据:历史、挑战和未来路线图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413345.

本文引用的文献

1
Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular events.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林预防心血管事件的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):CD005158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub4.
2
Identification of myocardial infarction type from electronic hospital data in England and Australia: a comparative data linkage study.从英国和澳大利亚的电子医院数据中识别心肌梗死类型:一项比较性数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e019217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019217.
3
Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis.
多级逻辑回归分析中的中级和高级主题。
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 10;36(20):3257-3277. doi: 10.1002/sim.7336. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
The underutilisation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中双重抗血小板治疗的未充分利用
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.077. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中双重抗血小板治疗的持续时间。
Heart. 2017 Apr;103(8):573-580. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309871. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
The median hazard ratio: a useful measure of variance and general contextual effects in multilevel survival analysis.中位数风险比:多级生存分析中方差和一般背景效应的有用度量。
Stat Med. 2017 Mar 15;36(6):928-938. doi: 10.1002/sim.7188. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
7
Clinical factors associated with initiation of and persistence with ADP receptor-inhibiting oral antiplatelet treatment after acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide cohort study from Finland.急性冠状动脉综合征后启动和持续使用 ADP 受体抑制性口服抗血小板治疗的相关临床因素:一项来自芬兰的全国性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 22;6(11):e012604. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012604.
8
International patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy duration after acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征后双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的国际模式。
Heart. 2017 Jan 15;103(2):132-138. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309509. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016.澳大利亚国家心脏基金会和澳大利亚及新西兰心脏学会:2016 年澳大利亚急性冠状动脉综合征管理临床指南。
Med J Aust. 2016 Aug 1;205(3):128-33. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00368.
10
Timing of First Postdischarge Follow-up and Medication Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后首次出院后随访和药物依从性的时间。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):147-55. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0001.