Turman Daniel L, Stockbridge Randy B
Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.
Program in Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
J Gen Physiol. 2017 Apr 3;149(4):511-522. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611747. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
The Fluc family of proteins comprises small, electrodiffusive fluoride channels, which prevent accumulation of toxic F ions in microorganisms. Recent crystal structures have confirmed their unusual architecture, in which a pair of antiparallel subunits convenes to form a dimer with a twofold symmetry axis parallel to the plane of the membrane. These structures have also revealed the interactions between Fluc channels and several different fibronectin domain monobodies that inhibit Fluc-mediated F currents; in all structures, each channel binds to two monobodies symmetrically, one on either side of the membrane. However, these structures do not reveal the mechanism of monobody inhibition. Moreover, the results appear to diverge from a recent electrophysiological study indicating that monobody binding is negatively cooperative; that is, a bound monobody on one side of a Fluc channel decreases the affinity of an oppositely bound monobody by ∼10-fold. In this study, we reconcile these observations by probing the mechanism of monobody binding and its negative cooperativity using electrophysiological experiments in planar lipid bilayers. Our results indicate that monobody inhibition occurs via a pore-blocking mechanism and that negative cooperativity arises from electrostatic repulsion between the oppositely bound monobodies. A single glutamate residue, on a loop of the monobody that extends into the channel interior, is responsible for negatively cooperative binding. This glutamate side chain also confers voltage dependence and sensitivity to the concentration of trans-F ion to monobody binding. Neutralization by mutation to glutamine abolishes these electrostatic effects. Monobodies that are amenable to cocrystallization with Fluc channels lack an analogous negatively charged side chain and bind independently to opposite sides of the channel. Thus, this work reveals the source of voltage dependence and negative cooperativity of monobody binding to Fluc channels along with the pore-blocking mechanism.
Fluc蛋白家族由小型的电扩散氟离子通道组成,这些通道可防止微生物中有毒氟离子的积累。最近的晶体结构证实了它们不同寻常的结构,其中一对反平行亚基聚集形成一个具有与膜平面平行的二重对称轴的二聚体。这些结构还揭示了Fluc通道与几种不同的纤连蛋白结构域单克隆抗体之间的相互作用,这些单克隆抗体可抑制Fluc介导的氟电流;在所有结构中,每个通道对称地结合两个单克隆抗体,在膜的两侧各一个。然而,这些结构并未揭示单克隆抗体抑制的机制。此外,这些结果似乎与最近的一项电生理研究结果不同,该研究表明单克隆抗体结合是负协同的;也就是说,Fluc通道一侧结合的单克隆抗体可使另一侧相反结合的单克隆抗体的亲和力降低约10倍。在本研究中,我们通过在平面脂质双分子层中进行电生理实验来探究单克隆抗体结合的机制及其负协同性,从而调和了这些观察结果。我们的结果表明,单克隆抗体抑制是通过孔道阻塞机制发生的,负协同性源于相反结合的单克隆抗体之间的静电排斥。单克隆抗体延伸到通道内部的环上的单个谷氨酸残基负责负协同结合。该谷氨酸侧链还赋予单克隆抗体结合的电压依赖性和对反式氟离子浓度的敏感性。突变为谷氨酰胺进行中和可消除这些静电效应。适合与Fluc通道共结晶的单克隆抗体缺乏类似的带负电荷的侧链,并独立结合到通道的相对两侧。因此,这项工作揭示了单克隆抗体与Fluc通道结合的电压依赖性和负协同性的来源以及孔道阻塞机制。