• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院复苏后讨论实践与院内心脏骤停复苏流程措施及结果的相关性研究

Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices With Adherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

机构信息

University of Missouri Kansas City (A.O.M., M.K., V.H., P.S.C.).

Saint Lukes' Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (A.O.M., K.M.C., V.H., P.S.C.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006695. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695
PMID:33201736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7678815/
Abstract

Background Identifying actionable resuscitation practices that vary across hospitals could improve adherence to process measures or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We sought to examine whether hospital debriefing frequency after IHCA varies across hospitals and whether hospitals which routinely perform debriefing have higher rates of process-of-care compliance or survival. Methods We conducted a nationwide survey of hospital resuscitation practices in April of 2018, which were then linked to data from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation national registry for IHCA. Hospitals were categorized according to their reported frequency of debriefing immediately after IHCA; rarely (0%-20% of all IHCA cases), occasionally (21%-80%), and frequently (81%-100%). Hospital-level rates of timely defibrillation (≤2 minutes), epinephrine administration (≤5 minutes), survival to discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurologically intact survival were comparted for patients with IHCA from 2015 to 2017. Results Overall, there were 193 hospitals comprising 44 477 IHCA events. Mean patient age was 65±16, 41% were females, and 68% were of White race. Across hospitals, 84 (43.5%) rarely performed debriefings immediately after an IHCA, 82 (42.5%) performed debriefing sessions occasionally, and 27 (14.0%) performed debriefing frequently. There was no association between higher reported debriefing frequency and hospital rates of timely defibrillation and epinephrine administration. Mean hospital rates of risk-standardized survival to discharge were similar across debriefing frequency groups (rarely 25.6%; occasionally 26.0%; frequently 25.2%, =0.72), as were hospital rates of risk-adjusted return of spontaneous circulation (rarely 72.2%; occasionally 73.0%; frequently 70.0%, =0.06) and neurologically intact survival (rarely 21.9%, occasionally 22.2%, frequently 21.1%, =0.75). Conclusions In a large contemporary nationwide quality improvement registry, hospitals varied widely in how often they conducted debriefings immediately after IHCA. However, hospital debriefing frequency was not associated with better adherence to timely delivery of epinephrine or defibrillation or higher rates of IHCA survival.

摘要

背景

识别不同医院之间存在差异的可操作性复苏实践,可能会提高院内心搏骤停(IHCA)后过程指标或结果的依从性。我们试图研究 IHCA 后医院的复苏讨论频率是否存在差异,以及是否经常进行复苏讨论的医院更符合护理过程规范或生存率更高。

方法

我们于 2018 年 4 月对医院复苏实践进行了全国性调查,并将其与来自 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 院内心搏骤停国家注册中心的数据进行了关联。根据报告的 IHCA 后即刻复苏讨论频率,将医院分为三类:很少(所有 IHCA 病例的 0%-20%)、偶尔(21%-80%)和经常(81%-100%)。比较了 2015 年至 2017 年期间 IHCA 患者的及时除颤(≤2 分钟)、肾上腺素给药(≤5 分钟)、出院存活率、自主循环恢复率和神经功能完整存活率的医院水平。

结果

共有 193 家医院纳入了 44477 例 IHCA 事件。患者平均年龄为 65±16 岁,41%为女性,68%为白人。在不同的医院中,84 家(43.5%)很少在 IHCA 后立即进行复苏讨论,82 家(42.5%)偶尔进行复苏讨论,27 家(14.0%)经常进行复苏讨论。报告的复苏讨论频率越高,医院的及时除颤和肾上腺素给药率并没有更高。不同复苏讨论频率组的医院出院时风险标准化存活率平均值相似(很少 25.6%;偶尔 26.0%;经常 25.2%,=0.72),风险调整后自主循环恢复率(很少 72.2%;偶尔 73.0%;经常 70.0%,=0.06)和神经功能完整存活率(很少 21.9%,偶尔 22.2%,经常 21.1%,=0.75)也相似。

结论

在一个大型的当代全国质量改进注册中心,医院在 IHCA 后进行复苏讨论的频率差异很大。然而,医院复苏讨论的频率与及时给予肾上腺素或除颤的依从性更好或 IHCA 生存率更高之间没有关联。

相似文献

1
Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices With Adherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.医院复苏后讨论实践与院内心脏骤停复苏流程措施及结果的相关性研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006695. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Association Between Hospital Recognition for Resuscitation Guideline Adherence and Rates of Survival for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.医院对复苏指南依从性的认可与院内心脏骤停生存率之间的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005429.
3
Risk-Standardizing Rates of Return of Spontaneous Circulation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest to Facilitate Hospital Comparisons.风险标准化院内心脏骤停自主循环恢复率,以促进医院间比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014837. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014837. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
4
Association Between Prompt Defibrillation and Epinephrine Treatment With Long-Term Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.及时除颤与肾上腺素治疗与院内心脏骤停后长期生存的关系。
Circulation. 2018 May 8;137(19):2041-2051. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030488. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Description of hot debriefings after in-hospital cardiac arrests in an international pediatric quality improvement collaborative.国际儿科质量改进合作项目中院内心搏骤停后热点汇报描述。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 26.
6
How Do Resuscitation Teams at Top-Performing Hospitals for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Succeed? A Qualitative Study.顶尖院内心脏骤停救治医院的复苏团队如何取得成功?一项定性研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jul 10;138(2):154-163. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033674.
7
Hospital variation in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后生存率的医院差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 31;3(1):e000400. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000400.
8
Improved Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance With CODE ACES: A Resuscitation Quality Bundle.采用 CODE ACES 的心肺复苏术(CPR)质量改进:复苏质量捆绑包。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e009860. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009860.
9
Resuscitation Practices Associated With Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Survey.院内心脏骤停后与生存相关的复苏实践:一项全国性调查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):189-97. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0073.
10
Failure to comply with NCCN guidelines for the management of pancreatic cancer compromises outcomes.不符合 NCCN 胰腺癌管理指南会影响治疗效果。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Aug;14(8):539-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00496.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical team debriefing post-critical events: perceptions, benefits, and barriers among learners.危重症事件后临床团队总结汇报:学习者的认知、益处及障碍
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 20;11:1406988. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1406988. eCollection 2024.
2
Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.儿科重症监护进修医生关于复苏后病例汇报的调查
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Nov 27;10(4):247-254. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2036. eCollection 2023 Fall.

本文引用的文献

1
Annual Incidence of Adult and Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States.美国成人及儿童住院期间心脏骤停的年发病率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jul 9;12(7):e005580.
2
The impact of a fellow-driven debriefing program after pediatric cardiac arrests.儿科心脏骤停后同伴驱动的讨论方案的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1711-y.
3
Healthcare Provider Perceptions of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality During Simulation Training.医疗服务提供者对模拟训练中心肺复苏质量的认知。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):e473-e479. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002058.
4
Failure to Debrief after Critical Events in Anesthesia Is Associated with Failures in Communication during the Event.在麻醉关键事件后未能进行汇报与事件过程中的沟通失败有关。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002649.
5
Delays in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Defibrillation, and Epinephrine Administration All Decrease Survival in In-hospital Cardiac Arrest.心肺复苏、除颤和肾上腺素给药的延迟均降低院内心搏骤停患者的生存率。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):414-422. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002563.
6
2018 American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs During and Immediately After Cardiac Arrest: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.2018 年美国心脏协会关于心脏骤停期间和之后抗心律失常药物使用的高级心血管生命支持重点更新:对美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南的更新。
Circulation. 2018 Dec 4;138(23):e740-e749. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000613.
7
Improved Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance With CODE ACES: A Resuscitation Quality Bundle.采用 CODE ACES 的心肺复苏术(CPR)质量改进:复苏质量捆绑包。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e009860. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009860.
8
Predicting neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest-external validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation score.预测院内心脏骤停后神经功能完整存活的可能性-复苏尝试后良好结局评分的外部验证。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.035. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Association Between Prompt Defibrillation and Epinephrine Treatment With Long-Term Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.及时除颤与肾上腺素治疗与院内心脏骤停后长期生存的关系。
Circulation. 2018 May 8;137(19):2041-2051. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030488. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第7部分:成人高级心血管生命支持:2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261.