University of Missouri Kansas City (A.O.M., M.K., V.H., P.S.C.).
Saint Lukes' Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (A.O.M., K.M.C., V.H., P.S.C.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006695. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006695. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Background Identifying actionable resuscitation practices that vary across hospitals could improve adherence to process measures or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We sought to examine whether hospital debriefing frequency after IHCA varies across hospitals and whether hospitals which routinely perform debriefing have higher rates of process-of-care compliance or survival. Methods We conducted a nationwide survey of hospital resuscitation practices in April of 2018, which were then linked to data from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation national registry for IHCA. Hospitals were categorized according to their reported frequency of debriefing immediately after IHCA; rarely (0%-20% of all IHCA cases), occasionally (21%-80%), and frequently (81%-100%). Hospital-level rates of timely defibrillation (≤2 minutes), epinephrine administration (≤5 minutes), survival to discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurologically intact survival were comparted for patients with IHCA from 2015 to 2017. Results Overall, there were 193 hospitals comprising 44 477 IHCA events. Mean patient age was 65±16, 41% were females, and 68% were of White race. Across hospitals, 84 (43.5%) rarely performed debriefings immediately after an IHCA, 82 (42.5%) performed debriefing sessions occasionally, and 27 (14.0%) performed debriefing frequently. There was no association between higher reported debriefing frequency and hospital rates of timely defibrillation and epinephrine administration. Mean hospital rates of risk-standardized survival to discharge were similar across debriefing frequency groups (rarely 25.6%; occasionally 26.0%; frequently 25.2%, =0.72), as were hospital rates of risk-adjusted return of spontaneous circulation (rarely 72.2%; occasionally 73.0%; frequently 70.0%, =0.06) and neurologically intact survival (rarely 21.9%, occasionally 22.2%, frequently 21.1%, =0.75). Conclusions In a large contemporary nationwide quality improvement registry, hospitals varied widely in how often they conducted debriefings immediately after IHCA. However, hospital debriefing frequency was not associated with better adherence to timely delivery of epinephrine or defibrillation or higher rates of IHCA survival.
识别不同医院之间存在差异的可操作性复苏实践,可能会提高院内心搏骤停(IHCA)后过程指标或结果的依从性。我们试图研究 IHCA 后医院的复苏讨论频率是否存在差异,以及是否经常进行复苏讨论的医院更符合护理过程规范或生存率更高。
我们于 2018 年 4 月对医院复苏实践进行了全国性调查,并将其与来自 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 院内心搏骤停国家注册中心的数据进行了关联。根据报告的 IHCA 后即刻复苏讨论频率,将医院分为三类:很少(所有 IHCA 病例的 0%-20%)、偶尔(21%-80%)和经常(81%-100%)。比较了 2015 年至 2017 年期间 IHCA 患者的及时除颤(≤2 分钟)、肾上腺素给药(≤5 分钟)、出院存活率、自主循环恢复率和神经功能完整存活率的医院水平。
共有 193 家医院纳入了 44477 例 IHCA 事件。患者平均年龄为 65±16 岁,41%为女性,68%为白人。在不同的医院中,84 家(43.5%)很少在 IHCA 后立即进行复苏讨论,82 家(42.5%)偶尔进行复苏讨论,27 家(14.0%)经常进行复苏讨论。报告的复苏讨论频率越高,医院的及时除颤和肾上腺素给药率并没有更高。不同复苏讨论频率组的医院出院时风险标准化存活率平均值相似(很少 25.6%;偶尔 26.0%;经常 25.2%,=0.72),风险调整后自主循环恢复率(很少 72.2%;偶尔 73.0%;经常 70.0%,=0.06)和神经功能完整存活率(很少 21.9%,偶尔 22.2%,经常 21.1%,=0.75)也相似。
在一个大型的当代全国质量改进注册中心,医院在 IHCA 后进行复苏讨论的频率差异很大。然而,医院复苏讨论的频率与及时给予肾上腺素或除颤的依从性更好或 IHCA 生存率更高之间没有关联。