Suppr超能文献

对非抑郁症患者进行前额叶电刺激可降低日常应激源所报告的负面影响水平。

Prefrontal electrical stimulation in non-depressed reduces levels of reported negative affects from daily stressors.

作者信息

Davis Nick J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 14;11:63. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00063. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Advances in neuroscience and pharmacology have led to improvements in the cognitive performance of people with neurological disease and other forms of cognitive decline. These same methods may also afford cognitive enhancement in people of otherwise normal cognitive abilities. "Cosmetic", or supranormal, cognitive enhancement offers opportunities to enrich our social or financial status, our interactions with others, and the common wealth of our community. It is common to focus on the potential benefits of cognitive enhancement, while being less than clear about the possible drawbacks. Here I examine the harms or side-effects associated with a range of cognitive enhancement interventions. I propose a taxonomy of harms in cognitive enhancement, with harms classified as (neuro)biological, ethical, or societal. Biological harms are those that directly affect the person's biological functioning, such as when a drug affects a person's mood or autonomic function. Ethical harms are those that touch on issues such as fairness and cheating, or on erosion of autonomy and coercion. Societal harms are harms that affect whole populations, and which are normally the province of governments, such as the use of enhancement in military contexts. This taxonomy of harms will help to focus the debate around the use and regulation of cognitive enhancement. In particular it will help to clarify the appropriate network of stakeholders who should take an interest in each potential harm, and in minimizing the impact of these harms.

摘要

神经科学和药理学的进展已使神经疾病患者及其他认知能力衰退形式的人群的认知表现得到改善。同样的方法或许也能提升认知能力原本正常的人的认知水平。“美容性”或超常的认知增强为丰富我们的社会或经济地位、我们与他人的互动以及我们社区的共同财富提供了机会。人们通常关注认知增强的潜在益处,却对可能存在的弊端认识不足。在此,我探讨了一系列认知增强干预措施所带来的危害或副作用。我提出了认知增强危害的分类法,将危害分为(神经)生物学、伦理或社会层面。生物学危害是那些直接影响人的生物功能的危害,比如药物影响人的情绪或自主功能时。伦理危害是那些涉及公平与作弊等问题,或涉及自主性的侵蚀和强制的危害。社会危害是影响整个人口的危害,通常属于政府范畴,比如在军事环境中使用增强手段。这种危害分类法将有助于聚焦围绕认知增强的使用和监管的辩论。特别是,它将有助于厘清对每种潜在危害应予以关注并尽量减少这些危害影响的适当利益相关者网络。

相似文献

2
3
5
9
Neuroenhancing public health.增强神经功能以促进公众健康。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jun;40(6):389-91. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101300. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS)的不良事件:一项综述。
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016 Dec 21;2:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017.
4
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.经颅直流电刺激的安全性:2016年循证更新
Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
The Seductive Allure of "Seductive Allure".“诱惑的魅力”。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan;8(1):88-90. doi: 10.1177/1745691612469035.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验