Roy Asim
Department of Information Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, USA.
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 16;8:186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00186. eCollection 2017.
The debate about representation in the brain and the nature of the cognitive system has been going on for decades now. This paper examines the neurophysiological evidence, primarily from single cell recordings, to get a better perspective on both the issues. After an initial review of some basic concepts, the paper reviews the data from single cell recordings - in cortical columns and of category-selective and multisensory neurons. In neuroscience, columns in the neocortex (cortical columns) are understood to be a basic functional/computational unit. The paper reviews the fundamental discoveries about the columnar organization and finds that it reveals a massively parallel search mechanism. This columnar organization could be the most extensive neurophysiological evidence for the widespread use of localist representation in the brain. The paper also reviews studies of category-selective cells. The evidence for category-selective cells reveals that localist representation is also used to encode complex abstract concepts at the highest levels of processing in the brain. A third major issue is the nature of the cognitive system in the brain and whether there is a form that is purely abstract and encoded by single cells. To provide evidence for a single-cell based purely abstract cognitive system, the paper reviews some of the findings related to multisensory cells. It appears that there is widespread usage of multisensory cells in the brain in the same areas where sensory processing takes place. Plus there is evidence for abstract modality invariant cells at higher levels of cortical processing. Overall, that reveals the existence of a purely abstract cognitive system in the brain. The paper also argues that since there is no evidence for dense distributed representation and since sparse representation is actually used to encode memories, there is actually no evidence for distributed representation in the brain. Overall, it appears that, at an abstract level, the brain is a massively parallel, distributed computing system that is symbolic. The paper also explains how grounded cognition and other theories of the brain are fully compatible with localist representation and a purely abstract cognitive system.
关于大脑中的表征以及认知系统的本质的争论已经持续了数十年。本文审视了主要来自单细胞记录的神经生理学证据,以便更好地洞察这两个问题。在初步回顾一些基本概念之后,本文回顾了来自单细胞记录的数据——关于皮层柱以及类别选择性神经元和多感觉神经元的数据。在神经科学中,新皮层中的柱(皮层柱)被理解为一个基本的功能/计算单元。本文回顾了关于柱状组织的基础发现,并发现它揭示了一种大规模并行搜索机制。这种柱状组织可能是大脑中广泛使用局部表征的最有力的神经生理学证据。本文还回顾了对类别选择性细胞的研究。类别选择性细胞的证据表明,局部表征也被用于在大脑处理的最高层级对复杂抽象概念进行编码。第三个主要问题是大脑中认知系统的本质,以及是否存在一种由单细胞编码的纯粹抽象形式。为了为基于单细胞的纯粹抽象认知系统提供证据,本文回顾了一些与多感觉细胞相关的发现。似乎在大脑中进行感觉处理的相同区域,多感觉细胞广泛存在。此外,在皮层处理的较高层级存在抽象模态不变细胞的证据。总体而言,这揭示了大脑中存在一个纯粹抽象的认知系统。本文还认为,由于没有证据支持密集分布式表征,且稀疏表征实际上被用于对记忆进行编码,所以实际上大脑中不存在分布式表征的证据。总体而言,从抽象层面看,大脑似乎是一个大规模并行、分布式的符号计算系统。本文还解释了具身认知和其他大脑理论如何与局部表征和纯粹抽象认知系统完全兼容。