Mok Robert M, Love Bradley C
University College London.
University of Cambridge.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;34(10):1719-1735. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01651.
For decades, researchers have debated whether mental representations are symbolic or grounded in sensory inputs and motor programs. Certainly, aspects of mental representations are grounded. However, does the brain also contain abstract concept representations that mediate between perception and action in a flexible manner not tied to the details of sensory inputs and motor programs? Such conceptual pointers would be useful when concepts remain constant despite changes in appearance and associated actions. We evaluated whether human participants acquire such representations using fMRI. Participants completed a probabilistic concept learning task in which sensory, motor, and category variables were not perfectly coupled or entirely independent, making it possible to observe evidence for abstract representations or purely grounded representations. To assess how the learned concept structure is represented in the brain, we examined brain regions implicated in flexible cognition (e.g., pFC and parietal cortex) that are most likely to encode an abstract representation removed from sensory-motor details. We also examined sensory-motor regions that might encode grounded sensory-motor-based representations tuned for categorization. Using a cognitive model to estimate participants' category rule and multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data, we found the left pFC and human middle temporal visual area (MT)/V5 coded for category in the absence of information coding for stimulus or response. Because category was based on the stimulus, finding an abstract representation of category was not inevitable. Our results suggest that certain brain areas support categorization behavior by constructing concept representations in a format akin to a symbol that differs from stimulus-motor codes.
几十年来,研究人员一直在争论心理表征是符号性的,还是基于感觉输入和运动程序。当然,心理表征的某些方面是基于感觉输入和运动程序的。然而,大脑中是否也包含抽象概念表征,这些表征以一种灵活的方式在感知和行动之间起中介作用,而不与感觉输入和运动程序的细节相关联?当概念尽管外观和相关行动发生变化但仍保持不变时,这种概念指针会很有用。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估了人类参与者是否获得了这样的表征。参与者完成了一项概率概念学习任务,其中感觉、运动和类别变量并非完美耦合或完全独立,这使得观察抽象表征或纯粹基于感觉运动的表征的证据成为可能。为了评估所学概念结构在大脑中的表征方式,我们检查了与灵活认知相关的脑区(例如前额叶皮质和顶叶皮质),这些脑区最有可能编码从感觉运动细节中抽象出来的表征。我们还检查了可能编码为分类调整的基于感觉运动的接地表征的感觉运动区域。使用认知模型估计参与者的类别规则并对fMRI数据进行多变量模式分析,我们发现左侧前额叶皮质和人类颞中视觉区域(MT)/V5在没有刺激或反应信息编码的情况下对类别进行编码。由于类别基于刺激,因此找到类别的抽象表征并非必然。我们的结果表明,某些脑区通过构建类似于符号的格式的概念表征来支持分类行为,这种格式不同于刺激运动代码。