• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么非接触眼压测量法无法评估角膜胶原交联的效果。

Why Non-contact Tonometry Tests Cannot Evaluate the Effects of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking.

作者信息

Ortillés Ángel, Rodríguez-Matas José F, Ariza-Gracia Miguel Á, Pascual Gemma, Calvo Begoña

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2017 Mar 1;33(3):184-192. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161206-02.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20161206-02
PMID:28264133
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of characterizing and following up the mechanical behavior of the corneal tissue after corneal cross-linking (CXL) by using a combined mechanical (in vivo indentation and in vitro uniaxial tensile tests) and morphological (immunohisto-chemistry) experimental protocol.

METHODS

CXL (3 mW/cm; 370 nm) for 20 minutes (total dose 3.6 J/cm) was performed on 12 New Zealand rabbits. The mechanical behavior of the cornea was characterized in small and large strain regimens using an in vivo indentation test with a laboratory device and an in vitro uniaxial tensile test, respectively. These tests and corneal immunohistochemistry were performed before (PreCXL) and on the 7th (PostCXL-7d) and 56th days (PostCXL-56d) after CXL. The intraocular pressure and corneal thickness were measured before each test.

RESULTS

For the indentation tests, significant differences were found between PreCXL and PostCXL-7d and between PostCXL-7d and PostCXL-56d, but not between PreCXL and PostCXL-56d. On average, for the small strain regimen, PostCXL-7d corneas showed the most compliant behavior, with progressive recovery of the corneal stiffness over time. For the large strain regimen, significant differences in the maximum tangent modulus between PreCXL and PostCXL-7d and between PreCXL and PostCXL-56d were observed for the uniaxial tensile tests, with no significant differences between PostCXL-7d and PostCXL-56d. Immunohistochemistry showed a lack of cells in the anterior stroma at PostCXL-7d, but at PostCXL-56d the cell density and morphology were comparable to PreCXL.

CONCLUSIONS

Indentation tests cannot characterize the changes in the corneal collagen scaffold caused by the CXL, but the uniaxial test can. However, indentation tests can assess the recovery of keratocyte density after CXL. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(3):184-192.].

摘要

目的

通过联合机械(体内压痕试验和体外单轴拉伸试验)和形态学(免疫组织化学)实验方案,评估表征和随访角膜交联(CXL)后角膜组织力学行为的可行性。

方法

对12只新西兰兔进行CXL(3 mW/cm;370 nm),持续20分钟(总剂量3.6 J/cm)。分别使用实验室设备进行体内压痕试验和体外单轴拉伸试验,在小应变和大应变条件下表征角膜的力学行为。这些试验以及角膜免疫组织化学在CXL前(PreCXL)、CXL后第7天(PostCXL-7d)和第56天(PostCXL-56d)进行。每次试验前测量眼压和角膜厚度。

结果

对于压痕试验,PreCXL与PostCXL-7d之间以及PostCXL-7d与PostCXL-56d之间存在显著差异,但PreCXL与PostCXL-56d之间无显著差异。平均而言,对于小应变条件,PostCXL-7d角膜表现出最柔顺的行为,角膜硬度随时间逐渐恢复。对于大应变条件,单轴拉伸试验中观察到PreCXL与PostCXL-7d之间以及PreCXL与PostCXL-56d之间最大切线模量存在显著差异,PostCXL-7d与PostCXL-56d之间无显著差异。免疫组织化学显示PostCXL-7d时前基质中细胞缺失,但PostCXL-56d时细胞密度和形态与PreCXL相当。

结论

压痕试验无法表征CXL引起的角膜胶原支架变化,但单轴试验可以。然而,压痕试验可以评估CXL后角膜细胞密度的恢复情况。[《屈光手术杂志》。2017;33(3):184 - 192。]

相似文献

1
Why Non-contact Tonometry Tests Cannot Evaluate the Effects of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking.为什么非接触眼压测量法无法评估角膜胶原交联的效果。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Mar 1;33(3):184-192. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161206-02.
2
The Relationship Between Mechanical Properties, Ultrastructural Changes, and Intrafibrillar Bond Formation in Corneal UVA/Riboflavin Cross-linking Treatment for Keratoconus.圆锥角膜的角膜紫外线A/核黄素交联治疗中机械性能、超微结构变化与纤维内键形成之间的关系
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):264-272. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180220-01.
3
Increased corneal hysteresis after corneal collagen crosslinking: a study based on applanation resonance technology.角膜交联术后角膜滞后力增加:基于压平共振技术的研究。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;132(12):1426-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3029.
4
Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking.加速与传统角膜胶原交联
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.012.
5
Customized Corneal Cross-linking Using Different UVA Beam Profiles.使用不同紫外线A光束轮廓的定制角膜交联术。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):676-682. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-07.
6
Corneal Nerve Regeneration After Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment of Keratoconus: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study.圆锥角膜胶原交联治疗后的角膜神经再生:一项5年纵向研究。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4518.
7
Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results.角膜胶原交联联合核黄素和紫外线 A 照射治疗圆锥角膜:长期疗效。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
8
Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking.基于动态 Scheimpflug 技术的圆锥角膜评估及角膜交联术的效果。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;30(6):408-14. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140513-02.
9
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy After Contact Lens-Assisted Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Thin Keratoconic Corneas.软性角膜接触镜辅助角膜胶原交联治疗薄圆锥角膜后的体内共聚焦显微镜检查
J Refract Surg. 2016 May 1;32(5):326-31. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160225-04.
10
Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers.使用三种不同眼压计测量圆锥角膜患者在核黄素/紫外线A角膜胶原交联术前和术后的眼压
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):142-52. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2011.8328.

引用本文的文献

1
A detailed methodology to model the Non Contact Tonometry: a Fluid Structure Interaction study.一种用于模拟非接触眼压计的详细方法:流体结构相互作用研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 4;10:981665. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.981665. eCollection 2022.
2
Mechanical behaviour of healthy versus alkali-lesioned corneas by a porcine organ culture model.猪器官培养模型研究健康与堿性损伤角膜的力学性能。
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Oct 28;17(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03050-1.
3
Cornea modelling.角膜建模
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Jan 7;7:2. doi: 10.1186/s40662-019-0166-x. eCollection 2020.