Jäger Cornelia, Steinhäuser Jost, Freund Tobias, Kuse Sarah, Szecsenyi Joachim, Wensing Michel
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 4. OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck, Institute of Family Medicine, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 6;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0559-y.
We developed and evaluated a tailored programme to implement three evidence-based recommendations for multimorbid patients with polypharmacy into primary care practices: structured medication counselling including brown bag reviews, the use of medication lists and medication reviews. No effect on the primary outcome was found. This process evaluation aimed to identify factors associated with outcomes by exploring nine hypotheses specified in the logic model of the tailored programme.
The tailored programme was developed with respect to identified determinants of practice and consisted of a workshop for practice teams, elaboration of implementation action plans, aids for medication reviews, a multilingual info-tool for patients on a tablet PC, posters and brown paper bags as reminders for patients. The tailored programme was evaluated in a cluster randomized trial. The process evaluation was based on various data sources: interviews with general practitioners and medical assistants of the intervention group and a survey with general practitioners of the intervention and control group, written reports on the implementation action plans, documentation forms for structured medication counselling and the log file of the info-tool.
We analyzed 12 interviews, 21 questionnaires, 120 documentation forms for medication counselling, 5 implementation action plans and one log file of the info-tool. The most frequently reported effect of the tailored programme was the increase of awareness for the health problem and the recommendations, while implementation of routine processes was only reported for structured medication counselling. The survey largely confirmed the usefulness of the applied strategies, yet the interviews provided a more detailed understanding of the actual use of the strategies and several suggestions for modifications of the tailored programme.
The tailored programme seemed to have induced awareness as a first step of behaviour change. Several modifications of the tailored programme may enhance its effectiveness such as conducting outreach visits instead of a workshop, improved targeting, provision of evidence, integration of tools into the practice software and information materials in tailored formats.
This study is linked to an outcome evaluation study with the registration ISRCTN34664024 , assigned 14/08/2013.
我们制定并评估了一项针对性计划,以将三项基于证据的建议应用于基层医疗实践中患有多种疾病且用药复杂的患者:包括棕色药袋评估在内的结构化药物咨询、使用用药清单和进行药物审查。但未发现对主要结局有影响。本过程评估旨在通过探索针对性计划逻辑模型中指定的九个假设来确定与结局相关的因素。
根据确定的实践决定因素制定了针对性计划,包括为实践团队举办一次研讨会、制定实施行动计划、提供药物审查辅助工具、在平板电脑上为患者提供多语言信息工具、张贴海报以及使用棕色纸袋作为患者提醒物。在一项整群随机试验中对针对性计划进行了评估。过程评估基于多种数据来源:对干预组的全科医生和医疗助理进行访谈,对干预组和对照组的全科医生进行调查,关于实施行动计划的书面报告,结构化药物咨询的文档表格以及信息工具的日志文件。
我们分析了12份访谈、21份问卷以及120份药物咨询文档表格、5份实施行动计划和一份信息工具日志文件。针对性计划最常报告的效果是提高了对健康问题和建议的认识,而仅在结构化药物咨询方面报告了常规流程的实施情况。调查在很大程度上证实了所应用策略的有用性,但访谈提供了对策略实际使用情况的更详细理解以及对针对性计划进行修改的若干建议。
针对性计划似乎已引发了意识,这是行为改变的第一步。针对性计划的若干修改可能会提高其有效性,例如进行外展访问而非举办研讨会、改进目标设定、提供证据、将工具集成到实践软件中以及以定制格式提供信息材料。
本研究与一项结局评估研究相关联,注册号为ISRCTN34664024,于2013年8月14日分配。