Suppr超能文献

德国医疗保健专业人员对在全科医疗中实施多重用药相关建议的看法:一项定性研究。

German healthcare professionals' perspective on implementing recommendations about polypharmacy in general practice: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Straßner Cornelia, Steinhäuser Jost, Freund Tobias, Szecsenyi Joachim, Wensing Michel

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):503-510. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx127.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Key recommendations for the management of patients with polypharmacy are structured medication counselling (SMC), medication lists and systematic medication reviews.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify determinants (hindering and facilitating factors) for the implementation of the recommendations in general practice.

METHODS

This study was linked to a tailored intervention aimed at improving the implementation of the recommendations in German general practice. Interviews and focus groups with different healthcare professionals were carried out in the design phase and after delivery of the intervention. The material from both data collections was analysed separately in a content analytical approach resulting in two sets of categories. For this study, the subcategories of both sets were assigned to the Tailoring Interventions for Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist, a comprehensive framework of determinants of practice.

RESULTS

Interviews with 24 general practitioners (GPs), 4 other medical specialists, 1 pharmacist, 3 nurses and 6 medical assistants as well as 2 mixed focus groups with 17 professionals were conducted. We identified 93 determinants: 29 referred to medication counselling, 21 to the use of medication lists, 20 to medications reviews and 23 to all recommendations. The determinants were related to all 7 main domains and to 25 of the 57 subdomains on the TICD checklist including guideline factors, patient factors, individual healthcare professional factors, social, political and legal factors, incentives and resources, and capacity for organizational change.

CONCLUSION

While many interventions to improve polypharmacy focus on the provision of pharmacological knowledge, a much wider range of domains need to be addressed, such as communication skills, patient involvement and practice organization.

摘要

背景

针对多病用药患者管理的关键建议包括结构化药物咨询(SMC)、用药清单和系统的用药评估。

目的

本研究旨在确定在全科医疗中实施这些建议的决定因素(阻碍因素和促进因素)。

方法

本研究与一项旨在改善德国全科医疗中这些建议实施情况的针对性干预措施相关联。在设计阶段和干预实施后,对不同医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论。对这两次数据收集的材料分别采用内容分析法进行分析,得出两组类别。对于本研究,将两组的子类别分配到慢性病定制干预(TICD)清单中,这是一个全面的实践决定因素框架。

结果

对24名全科医生(GP)、4名其他医学专家、1名药剂师、3名护士和6名医疗助理进行了访谈,并与17名专业人员进行了2次混合焦点小组讨论。我们确定了93个决定因素:29个涉及药物咨询,21个涉及用药清单的使用,20个涉及用药评估,23个涉及所有建议。这些决定因素与TICD清单上的所有7个主要领域以及57个子领域中的25个相关,包括指南因素、患者因素、个体医疗保健专业人员因素、社会、政治和法律因素、激励措施和资源以及组织变革能力。

结论

虽然许多改善多病用药的干预措施侧重于提供药理学知识,但需要解决更广泛的领域,如沟通技巧、患者参与和实践组织。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验