• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A 52-week comparison of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in hypertension.

作者信息

Kochar M S, Bolek G, Kalbfleisch J H, Olzinski P

机构信息

Medical Service of the Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 May-Jun;27(5):373-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb03033.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb03033.x
PMID:2826549
Abstract

Lisinopril is a long-acting converting-enzyme inhibitor. A 52-week study was undertaken to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), and a combination of the two drugs in 24 patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 to 120 mm Hg. After a four-week single-blind placebo-washout phase, ten patients received lisinopril, ten received HCTZ, and four received the combination in increasing doses in a double-blind fashion for the next 12 weeks. The target blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg DBP and a decrease of at least 10 mm Hg. For the next 12 weeks, the responders continued to receive the same medications; however, the nonresponders from the two groups received the combination, increasing the number of patients receiving both to 13. The DBP was controlled in eight of the ten patients with lisinopril, three of the ten patients with HCTZ, and 11 of 13 (four original and nine nonresponders) with the combination. For the next 28 weeks, 17 patients agreed to continue into a single-blind phase, during which blood pressure was controlled in six of the seven patients who were treated with lisinopril alone and nine of ten who received the combination. The heart rate rose significantly in the HCTZ-treated patients during the short-term treatment and decreased significantly in those treated with lisinopril during the long-term phase. Side effects were more frequent in patients receiving the combination but were always mild and subsided spontaneously. Lisinopril appeared to be more effective than HCTZ as a step-1 drug, and the combination was superior to either agent alone.

摘要

相似文献

1
A 52-week comparison of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in hypertension.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 May-Jun;27(5):373-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb03033.x.
2
Controlled multicenter study of the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of 394 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 3:S36-42. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198700003-00010.
3
Treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison of lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide free combination.治疗轻至中度高血压:赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪固定复方制剂与卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪自由联合用药的比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:59-60; discussion 61.
4
The results of a large multicentre study comparing low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide with the monocomponents.一项比较低剂量赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与单一成分药物的大型多中心研究结果。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:73-6.
5
Introduction to lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination.赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪复方制剂介绍。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:49-51.
6
Plasma lipid profiles and antihypertensive agents: effects of lisinopril, enalapril, nitrendipine, hydralazine, and hydrochlorothiazide.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):546-50. doi: 10.1177/106002808802200704.
7
Efficacy and safety of delapril plus manidipine compared with enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate essential hypertension: results of a randomized trial.在轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中,比较地拉普利联合马尼地平与依那普利联合氢氯噻嗪的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.018.
8
Nocturnal reduction of blood pressure and the antihypertensive response to a diuretic or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in obese hypertensive patients. TROPHY Study Group.肥胖高血压患者夜间血压降低情况以及对利尿剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的降压反应。TROPHY研究组
Am J Hypertens. 1998 Aug;11(8 Pt 1):914-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00087-9.
9
Lisinopril versus lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension.
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Apr 1;61(10):803-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91070-3.
10
Lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination compared with the monocomponents in elderly hypertensive patients.赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪复方制剂与单一组分在老年高血压患者中的比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:85-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection.选择合适的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。选择指南。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):516-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00003.
2
Lisinopril. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure.赖诺普利。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在高血压和充血性心力衰竭中的治疗用途的初步综述。
Drugs. 1988 Jun;35(6):646-69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835060-00003.
3
ACE inhibitors compared with thiazide diuretics as first-step antihypertensive therapy.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Dec;3(6):815-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01869564.