• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗保健中重新点燃同情心:毛利关怀反思交流活动

Reigniting compassion in healthcare: Manaakitia Reflective Rounds.

作者信息

Shah Shamsul, Lambrecht Ingo, O'Callaghan Anne

机构信息

Palliative Care, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Manawanui Hinengaro Oranga Services, Mental Health Services for Māori, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2017 Jun;47(6):674-679. doi: 10.1111/imj.13420.

DOI:10.1111/imj.13420
PMID:28266121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The reported levels of staff stress and burnout at all levels of training and disciplines is significant and recognised to impact on the care of patients and families. We present an initiative to support staff at Auckland City Hospital based on the Schwartz Center Rounds.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of monthly case-based, staff support reflective rounds to discuss complex emotional and psychosocial issues that arise in caring for patients and families.

METHODS

At Auckland City Hospital, a pilot programme called Manaakitia Reflective Rounds was conducted between April 2014 and September 2015. These were facilitated 1-h, monthly, case-based, staff support groups to discuss complex emotional and psychosocial issues in caring for patients. Staff evaluations and feedback were collated.

RESULTS

A total of 12 rounds was conducted exploring a range of challenging issues, from difficulty in achieving a patient's wish to die at home to coping with the 'heart sink' patient. There were 276 attendees in total, with an average attendance of 23 participants per round. A total of 218 evaluations was returned (79%) with rounds being rated as either exceptional or excellent by 87.5% of participants. Attendees reported positive benefits, such as gaining knowledge to help them care for patients (94%), working better with colleagues (87%) and gaining insight into how others think and feel in caring for patients (97%). Attendees reported a sense of having a 'shared experience' with better understanding of each other's professional perspectives and acknowledgement of the limitations (practical and human) in caring for patients and families.

CONCLUSION

Evaluations of the rounds indicate a need for staff to have a safe and supportive space to explore the emotional aspects of their work. Staff particularly appeared to value having a 'shared understanding' with the recognition that they are 'not alone' when managing challenging situations.

摘要

背景

据报道,各级培训人员和各学科工作人员的压力和职业倦怠程度很高,且已认识到这会对患者及其家属的护理产生影响。我们基于施瓦茨中心巡诊会提出一项支持奥克兰市医院工作人员的倡议。

目的

评估以病例为基础的每月一次的工作人员支持反思巡诊会的效果,以讨论在护理患者及其家属过程中出现的复杂情感和社会心理问题。

方法

在奥克兰市医院,于2014年4月至2015年9月开展了一个名为“关爱反思巡诊会”的试点项目。这些巡诊会每月举行一次,为期1小时,以病例为基础,是工作人员支持小组,用于讨论护理患者过程中的复杂情感和社会心理问题。收集了工作人员的评估和反馈意见。

结果

共进行了12次巡诊会,探讨了一系列具有挑战性的问题,从难以实现患者在家中离世的愿望到应对“令人沮丧”的患者。总共有276人参加,平均每次巡诊会有23名参与者。共收回218份评估意见(回收率79%),87.5%的参与者将巡诊会评为优秀或卓越。参与者报告了积极的收获,如获得帮助他们护理患者的知识(94%)、与同事更好地合作(87%)以及深入了解他人在护理患者时的想法和感受(97%)。参与者报告有一种“共同经历”的感觉,能更好地理解彼此的专业观点,并认识到在护理患者及其家属方面存在的局限性(实际的和人为的)。

结论

对巡诊会的评估表明,工作人员需要一个安全且支持性的空间来探讨工作中的情感方面。工作人员似乎特别重视达成“共同理解”,并认识到在应对具有挑战性的情况时“并不孤单”。

相似文献

1
Reigniting compassion in healthcare: Manaakitia Reflective Rounds.在医疗保健中重新点燃同情心:毛利关怀反思交流活动
Intern Med J. 2017 Jun;47(6):674-679. doi: 10.1111/imj.13420.
2
Can Schwartz Center Rounds support healthcare staff with emotional challenges at work, and how do they compare with other interventions aimed at providing similar support? A systematic review and scoping reviews.施瓦茨中心巡诊能否为工作中面临情感挑战的医护人员提供支持,与旨在提供类似支持的其他干预措施相比又如何?一项系统评价和范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e024254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024254.
3
Realist evaluation of Schwartz rounds® for enhancing the delivery of compassionate healthcare: understanding how they work, for whom, and in what contexts.施瓦茨轮®在增强关爱医疗服务中的实际效果评估:了解其如何发挥作用、针对哪些人群以及在何种背景下发挥作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06483-4.
4
How to organise and run Schwartz rounds.如何组织和开展施瓦茨查房。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2023 Dec 7;30(6):22-25. doi: 10.7748/nm.2023.e2094. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
5
Mission Critical: Nursing Leadership Support for Compassion to Sustain Staff Well-being.关键任务:护理领导力对关怀的支持以维持员工福祉
Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jul/Sep;42(3):217-222. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000302.
6
The Schwartz Centre Rounds: Supporting mental health workers with the emotional impact of their work.施瓦茨中心轮:支持心理健康工作者应对工作中的情绪影响。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):942-952. doi: 10.1111/inm.12729. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Compassion fatigue and burnout: what managers should know.同情疲劳与职业倦怠:管理者应知晓的内容。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2011 Oct-Dec;30(4):325-33. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31823511f7.
8
Stress, burnout, compassion fatigue, and mental health in hospice workers in Minnesota.明尼苏达州临终关怀工作者的压力、倦怠、同情疲劳和心理健康。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;16(12):1534-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0202. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
9
Can Staff Be Supported to Deliver Compassionate Care Through Implementing Schwartz Rounds in Community and Mental Health Services?通过在社区和精神卫生服务中实施施瓦茨轮,能否为员工提供支持以提供关怀?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Sep;27(11):1652-1663. doi: 10.1177/1049732317702101. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
Implementing Schwartz Rounds in an Irish maternity hospital.在爱尔兰一家妇产医院实施施瓦茨轮谈。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;190(1):205-208. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02268-6. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of and coping mechanisms against mental and psychological burnout among healthcare professionals in a Malaysian public hospital: A cross-sectional study.马来西亚一家公立医院医护人员精神与心理倦怠的患病率及应对机制:一项横断面研究
Malays Fam Physician. 2025 Apr 18;20:19. doi: 10.51866/oa.755. eCollection 2025.
2
Teaching empathy and compassion to healthcare providers in palliative care: a scoping review.在姑息治疗中向医疗服务提供者传授同理心和同情心:一项范围综述
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Dec 12;18:1817. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1817. eCollection 2024.
3
What is the State of Organisational Compassion-Based Interventions Targeting to Improve Health Professionals' Well-Being? Results of a Systematic Review.
旨在改善卫生专业人员福祉的基于组织同情心的干预措施现状如何?一项系统评价的结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2246-2276. doi: 10.1111/jan.16484. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Individual Differences in Bodily Self-Consciousness and Its Neural Basis.身体自我意识的个体差异及其神经基础。
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 8;14(8):795. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080795.
5
Factors Affecting Perceived Work Environment, Wellbeing, and Coping Styles: A Comparison between Physicians and Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic.影响感知工作环境、幸福感和应对方式的因素:新冠疫情期间医生和护士的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711104.
6
Coping Strategies of Healthcare Professionals with Burnout Syndrome: A Systematic Review.医护人员应对倦怠综合征的策略:系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 21;58(2):327. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020327.