Struckman-Johnson Cindy, Gaster Samuel, Struckman-Johnson Dave, Johnson Melissa, May-Shinagle Gabby
University of South Dakota, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD 57069, USA.
University of South Dakota, 414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD 57069, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
A sample of 158 male and 357 female college students at a midwestern university participated in an on-line study of psychosocial motives for texting while driving. Men and women did not differ in self-reported ratings of how often they texted while driving. However, more women sent texts of less than a sentence while more men sent texts of 1-5 sentences. More women than men said they would quit texting while driving due to police warnings, receiving information about texting dangers, being shown graphic pictures of texting accidents, and being in a car accident. A hierarchical regression for men's data revealed that lower levels of feeling distracted by texting while driving (20% of the variance), higher levels of cell phone dependence (11.5% of the variance), risky behavioral tendencies (6.5% of the variance) and impulsivity (2.3%) of the variance) were significantly associated with more texting while driving (total model variance=42%). A separate regression for women revealed that higher levels of cell phone dependence (10.4% of the variance), risky behavioral tendencies (9.9% of the variance), texting distractibility (6.2%), crash risk estimates (2.2% of the variance) and driving confidence (1.3% of the variance) were significantly associated with more texting while driving (total model variance=31%.) Friendship potential and need for intimacy were not related to men's or women's texting while driving. Implications of the results for gender-specific prevention strategies are discussed.
来自一所中西部大学的158名男大学生和357名女大学生参与了一项关于开车时发短信的社会心理动机的在线研究。在自我报告的开车时发短信的频率方面,男性和女性没有差异。然而,更多女性发送的短信少于一句话,而更多男性发送的短信为1至5句话。比起男性,更多女性表示,由于警察警告、收到有关发短信危险的信息、看到发短信引发事故的图片以及遭遇车祸,她们会停止开车时发短信。对男性数据进行的分层回归显示,开车时因发短信而分心程度较低(占方差的20%)、手机依赖程度较高(占方差的11.5%)、冒险行为倾向(占方差的6.5%)和冲动性(占方差的2.3%)与开车时更多地发短信显著相关(总模型方差=42%)。对女性进行的单独回归显示,手机依赖程度较高(占方差的10.4%)、冒险行为倾向(占方差的9.9%)、发短信时的分心程度(6.2%)、撞车风险估计(占方差的2.2%)和驾驶信心(占方差的1.3%)与开车时更多地发短信显著相关(总模型方差=31%)。友谊潜力和亲密需求与男性或女性开车时发短信无关。文中讨论了研究结果对针对性别预防策略的启示。