Suppr超能文献

功率波动在精英越野滑雪运动员不同坡度 - 速度组合下对角与双撑子技术偏好中的作用

The Role of Power Fluctuations in the Preference of Diagonal vs. Double Poling Sub-Technique at Different Incline-Speed Combinations in Elite Cross-Country Skiers.

作者信息

Dahl Christine, Sandbakk Øyvind, Danielsen Jørgen, Ettema Gertjan

机构信息

Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2017 Feb 21;8:94. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00094. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

In classical cross-country skiing, diagonal stride (DIA) is the major uphill sub-technique, while double poling (DP) is used on relatively flat terrain. Although, the dependence of incline and speed on the preference of either sub-technique seems clearly established, the mechanisms behind these preferences are not clear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare kinetics and energy consumption in DP and DIA at the same submaximal workload in cross-country skiing under two different incline-speed combinations. We compared kinetics and physiological responses in DP and DIA at the same submaximal workload (≈200 W) under two different incline-speed conditions, (5%-12.5 km h vs. 12%-6.5 km h) where DP and DIA were expected to be preferred, respectively. Fifteen elite male cross-country skiers performed four separate 6.5-min roller skiing sessions on a treadmill at these two conditions using DP and DIA during which physiological variables, rate of perceived exertion () and kinetics, including power fluctuations, were recorded. At 12% incline, DIA resulted in lower physiological response (e.g., heart rate) and , and higher gross efficiency than DP, whereas at 5% incline these variables favored DP ( < 0.05). The skiers' preference for sub-technique (13 preferred DIA at 12% incline; all 15 preferred DP at 5% incline) was in accordance with these results. Fluctuation in instantaneous power was lowest in the preferred sub-technique at each condition ( < 0.05). Preference for DP at 5% incline (high speed) is most likely because the speed is too high for effective ski thrust in DIA, which is reflected in high power fluctuations. The mechanism for preference of DIA at 12% incline is not indicated directly by the current data set showing only small differences in power fluctuations between DIA and DP. Apart from the low speed allowing ski thrust, we suggest that restricted ability to utilize the body's mechanical energy as well as the use of arms in DP play an important role.

摘要

在传统越野滑雪中,斜向跨步(DIA)是主要的上坡子技术,而双杖滑雪(DP)则用于相对平坦的地形。尽管坡度和速度对这两种子技术偏好的依赖性似乎已明确确立,但这些偏好背后的机制尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较在两种不同坡度 - 速度组合下,越野滑雪时以相同次最大负荷进行双杖滑雪(DP)和斜向跨步(DIA)的动力学和能量消耗情况。我们比较了在两种不同坡度 - 速度条件下(5% - 12.5千米/小时与12% - 6.5千米/小时),以相同次最大负荷(约200瓦)进行双杖滑雪(DP)和斜向跨步(DIA)时的动力学和生理反应,在这两种条件下预计分别更偏好双杖滑雪(DP)和斜向跨步(DIA)。15名精英男性越野滑雪运动员在跑步机上针对这两种条件分别进行了4次6.5分钟的轮滑滑雪训练,训练中使用双杖滑雪(DP)和斜向跨步(DIA),期间记录生理变量、主观用力程度(RPE)以及包括功率波动在内的动力学数据。在12%的坡度下,与双杖滑雪(DP)相比,斜向跨步(DIA)导致较低的生理反应(如心率)和主观用力程度(RPE),以及更高的总效率,而在5%的坡度下,这些变量更有利于双杖滑雪(DP)(P < 0.05)。滑雪者对两种子技术的偏好(13人在12%的坡度下偏好斜向跨步(DIA);15人在5%的坡度下均偏好双杖滑雪(DP))与这些结果一致。在每种条件下,首选子技术的瞬时功率波动最低(P < 0.05)。在5%的坡度(高速)下偏好双杖滑雪(DP)很可能是因为对于斜向跨步(DIA)而言速度过高,无法有效产生滑雪推力,这反映在高功率波动上。当前数据集仅显示双杖滑雪(DP)和斜向跨步(DIA)之间的功率波动差异较小,并未直接表明在12%的坡度下偏好斜向跨步(DIA)的机制。除了低速有利于产生滑雪推力外,我们认为在双杖滑雪(DP)中利用身体机械能的能力受限以及手臂的使用起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7da1/5318423/bfbdcae7aa2e/fphys-08-00094-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验