Zhou Xiao-Yi, Xu Xi-Ming, Wang Fei, Wu Sui-Yi, Yang Yi-Lin, Li Ming, Huang Jian-Ming, Wei Xian-Zhao
Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University Department of Orthopaedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University Faculty of Naval Medicine, Second Military Medical University Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(10):e5626. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005626.
The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) has been developed to evaluate pain anxiety, which leads to avoidance of daily activities and normal movements. However, a simplified Chinese version of PASS is still not available. Physicians are not aware of which patients are prone to anxiety, and what the risk factors are.To cross-culturally adapt the PASS into a simplified Chinese version and test the reliability and validity. Factors affecting pain anxiety were also explored.The PASS was first translated into a simplified Chinese version according to a forward-backward method. Then, validations were tested including content validity, construct validity, and reliability. Content validity was analyzed by response trend. Construct validity was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis, and priori hypotheses testing. Reliability was analyzed by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Risk factors of catastrophizing were analyzed by performing multivariate liner regression.A total of 219 patients were included in the study. The scores of items were well distributed. Both CFA and exploratory factor analysis suggested a 2nd-order, 4-factor model, accounting for 65.42% of the total variance according to principle component analysis. SC-PASS obtained good reliability with a Cronbach α = 0.92 and ICC = 0.90. College education, long pain duration, and both married and divorced status were risk factors. Factors reduced pain-related anxiety were no medication assumption, female sex, widowed status, non-Han ethnicity, and having no religious belief.The SC-PASS was applicable in Chinese patients and it was suitable for the clinical uses in mainland China.
疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS)已被开发用于评估疼痛焦虑,这种焦虑会导致日常活动和正常运动的回避。然而,PASS的简体中文版仍然不可用。医生并不清楚哪些患者容易出现焦虑,以及风险因素是什么。为了将PASS进行跨文化改编为简体中文版并测试其信效度。还探讨了影响疼痛焦虑的因素。PASS首先根据前后翻译法被翻译成简体中文版。然后,进行了包括内容效度、结构效度和信度的验证测试。通过反应趋势分析内容效度。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)、探索性因素分析和先验假设检验分析结构效度。通过内部一致性和重测信度分析信度。通过进行多元线性回归分析灾难化的风险因素。本研究共纳入219例患者。项目得分分布良好。CFA和探索性因素分析均表明为二阶四因素模型,根据主成分分析占总方差的65.42%。简体中文版PASS(SC-PASS)获得了良好的信度,Cronbach α = 0.92,组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.90。大学学历、疼痛持续时间长以及已婚和离异状态是风险因素。降低疼痛相关焦虑的因素有无用药假设、女性、丧偶状态、非汉族和无宗教信仰。SC-PASS适用于中国患者,适用于中国大陆的临床应用。