Poropat F, Heinz P, Barbi E, Ventura A
University of Trieste, IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo Trieste (Italy), via dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste, 34137, Italy.
Emergency Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Mar 8;43(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y.
To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up.
This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-15 years) was performed.
Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0-15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and "well child", more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases.
ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
比较两家欧洲医院儿科急诊科的就诊情况及住院结局,这两家医院的儿科初级保健设置不同。
这是一项回顾性患病率研究,比较了2013年日历年中两家服务区域相似的急诊科的所有儿科急诊就诊情况:一家在意大利的里雅斯特,儿科初级保健由儿科专科医生提供;另一家在英国剑桥,儿科初级保健由全科医生提供。收集了就诊原因、出院诊断和住院率的数据,并对特定年龄组(<1岁、1 - 4岁、5 - 15岁)进行了亚组分析。
在12个月期间,剑桥有20331名儿童(0 - 15岁)就诊,的里雅斯特有18646名,两个中心的年龄分布非常相似,但最年幼年龄组除外:与急诊就诊儿童总数相比,英格兰婴儿就诊比例比意大利高1/3(15.4%对11.4%)。就诊原因相似:1岁以下,主要主诉为发热、呼吸困难和胃肠道问题,而在较大年龄组中,创伤是最常见的原因。在出院诊断方面,两家医院之间没有差异,除了生长发育迟缓及“健康儿童”,在英国5岁以下儿童中诊断更为频繁。剑桥的住院比例高出三倍(14.1%对4.8%),大多数儿童因传染病住院。
在由全科医生提供的初级保健环境中,婴儿急诊就诊更为常见,此外,由儿科专科医生提供初级保健使所有年龄组的住院率降低了1/3。由于本研究的方法学局限性,无法评估这些结果是否仅取决于儿科初级保健设置,还是由其他混杂因素决定。需要新的研究来证实这一初步证据。