Grap Mary Jo, Schubert Christine M, Burk Ruth S, Lucas Valentina, Wetzel Paul A, Pepperl Anathea, Munro Cindy L
Adult Health and Nursing Systems, Department of the School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, United States.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Oct;42:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
High frequency ultrasound (HFUS) systems may identify tissue injury. We compared HFUS tissue characteristics (dermal thickness and dermal density) with visual image examination.
Longitudinal study in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults, from three ICUs (Surgical Trauma, Medical Respiratory, Neuroscience) enrolled within 24hours of airway intubation. Sacral HFUS images were obtained daily for up to seven days. Expert evaluation of the best image per day was completed and compared to HFUS generated tissue characteristics (dermal thickness and dermal density).
Of the113 subjects with 1614 comparisons analysed, 73.2% to 84% were normal, and 6.3% to 11.8% of the comparisons had injury present but no change was noted in the injury observed. There were no significant differences in one-day comparisons among type of injury and mean dermal thickness (p=0.6645) or dermal median intensity (adjusted p=0.06-0.17). All other day-to-day comparisons were similarly non-significant.
We found no association among dermal density, dermal thickness and visual examination of changes in sacral HFUS images for any day-to-day comparison. The use of sacral HFUS as a screening tool for the development of tissue injury is in its infancy. Additional comparative studies should be conducted to identify its future clinical usefulness.
高频超声(HFUS)系统可能识别组织损伤。我们将高频超声的组织特征(真皮厚度和真皮密度)与视觉图像检查进行了比较。
对危重症机械通气成人进行纵向研究,这些患者来自三个重症监护病房(外科创伤、内科呼吸、神经科),在气道插管后24小时内入组。每天获取骶部高频超声图像,最多持续7天。每天完成对最佳图像的专家评估,并与高频超声生成的组织特征(真皮厚度和真皮密度)进行比较。
在分析的113名受试者的1614次比较中,73.2%至84%为正常,6.3%至11.8%的比较存在损伤,但观察到的损伤无变化。损伤类型与平均真皮厚度(p = 0.6645)或真皮中位强度(校正p = 0.06 - 0.17)的单日比较无显著差异。所有其他每日比较同样无显著差异。
在任何每日比较中,我们均未发现骶部高频超声图像变化的真皮密度、真皮厚度与视觉检查之间存在关联。将骶部高频超声用作组织损伤发生的筛查工具尚处于起步阶段。应开展更多比较研究以确定其未来的临床实用性。