• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Utility of registries for post-marketing evaluation of medicines. A survey of Swedish health care quality registries from a regulatory perspective.药品上市后评估登记处的效用。从监管角度对瑞典医疗保健质量登记处的一项调查。
Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Jun;122(2):136-147. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1285837. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
2
Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation : Operational proposals for increasing the use of patient registries in regulatory assessments.患者登记处:药物评估中未充分利用的资源:提高监管评估中患者登记处使用的操作性建议。
Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;42(11):1343-1351. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9.
3
Pragmatic clinical trials in the context of regulation of medicines.在药品监管背景下的实用临床试验。
Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;124(1):37-41. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1515280. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
4
Registries in European post-marketing surveillance: a retrospective analysis of centrally approved products, 2005-2013.欧洲上市后监测中的注册研究:2005-2013 年集中批准产品的回顾性分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1442-1450. doi: 10.1002/pds.4196. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
5
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
7
Review of 103 Swedish Healthcare Quality Registries.103 个瑞典医疗质量注册中心的回顾。
J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):94-136. doi: 10.1111/joim.12303. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
8
Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.退行性腰椎疾病(腰椎滑脱、狭窄或椎间盘突出)的两年综合医学管理:成本、疼痛、残疾和生活质量的价值分析:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):143-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320. Epub 2014 May 2.
9
Registry-Based Medical Research: Data Dredging or Value Building to Quality of Care?基于注册的医学研究:是数据挖掘还是为了提高医疗质量而创造价值?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jul;108(1):274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.060. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
10
[A perspective for the role of drug registries in the post-marketing surveillance].
Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Jun;104(6):280-7. doi: 10.1701/1295.14331.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis as used in clinical practice: results from the ARTIS programme.生物制剂和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药物在类风湿关节炎临床应用中的安全性:来自 ARTIS 研究计划的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 May;82(5):601-610. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223762. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings.开发一个评估医疗环境中数据源质量的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):944-952. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac017.
3
The profile of the COvid-19 VACcination register SAFEty study in Sweden (CoVacSafe-SE).《瑞典 COVID-19 疫苗接种登记研究的安全性概况(CoVacSafe-SE)》。
Ups J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 10;126. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v126.8136. eCollection 2021.
4
Pragmatic clinical trials in the context of regulation of medicines.在药品监管背景下的实用临床试验。
Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;124(1):37-41. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1515280. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer risk in patients with spondyloarthritis treated with TNF inhibitors: a collaborative study from the ARTIS and DANBIO registers.肿瘤风险在脊柱关节炎患者接受 TNF 抑制剂治疗:来自 ARTIS 和 DANBIO 登记处的合作研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):105-111. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209270. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
The First Decade with the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register - A Systematic Review of the Output in the Scientific Literature.瑞典处方药登记系统的首个十年——对科学文献产出的系统评价
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016 Nov;119(5):464-469. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12613. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Can rheumatoid arthritis (RA) registries provide contextual safety data for modern RA clinical trials? The case for mortality and cardiovascular disease.类风湿关节炎(RA)登记处能否为现代 RA 临床试验提供背景安全性数据?以死亡率和心血管疾病为例。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1797-805. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208698. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
4
How to improve the quality of evidence when new treatments are funded conditional on collecting evidence of effectiveness and safety.当新治疗方法在以收集有效性和安全性证据为条件获得资助时,如何提高证据质量。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Apr;21(2):71-2. doi: 10.1177/1355819615621584. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Methodological Challenges When Comparing Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of International Observational Registries.比较国际观察性登记处的人口统计学和临床特征时的方法学挑战。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;67(12):1637-45. doi: 10.1002/acr.22661.
6
The Swedish MS registry – clinical support tool and scientific resource.瑞典多发性硬化症登记处——临床支持工具和科学资源。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(199):11-9. doi: 10.1111/ane.12425.
7
The EUTOS population-based registry: incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 European Countries.EUTOS 基于人群的注册研究:20 个欧洲国家 2904 例 CML 患者的发病情况和临床特征。
Leukemia. 2015 Jun;29(6):1336-43. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.73. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Glycaemic control of Type 1 diabetes in clinical practice early in the 21st century: an international comparison.21世纪初临床实践中1型糖尿病的血糖控制:一项国际比较。
Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):1036-50. doi: 10.1111/dme.12676. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Review of 103 Swedish Healthcare Quality Registries.103 个瑞典医疗质量注册中心的回顾。
J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):94-136. doi: 10.1111/joim.12303. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
10
Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK.急性心肌梗死:瑞典和英国国家结局注册研究中短期生存率的比较。
Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1305-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62070-X. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

药品上市后评估登记处的效用。从监管角度对瑞典医疗保健质量登记处的一项调查。

Utility of registries for post-marketing evaluation of medicines. A survey of Swedish health care quality registries from a regulatory perspective.

作者信息

Feltelius Nils, Gedeborg Rolf, Holm Lennart, Zethelius Björn

机构信息

a Swedish Medical Products Agency , Uppsala , Sweden.

出版信息

Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Jun;122(2):136-147. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1285837. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1080/03009734.2017.1285837
PMID:28276780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5441374/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe content and procedures in some selected Swedish health care quality registries (QRs) of relevance to regulatory decision-making.

METHODS

A workshop was organized with participation of seven Swedish QRs which subsequently answered a questionnaire regarding registry content on drug treatments and outcomes. Patient populations, coverage, data handling and quality control, as well as legal and ethical aspects are presented. Scientific publications from the QRs are used as a complementary measure of quality and scientific relevance.

RESULTS

The registries under study collect clinical data of high relevance to regulatory and health technology agencies. Five out of seven registries provide information on the drug of interest. When applying external quality criteria, we found a high degree of fulfillment, although information on medication was not sufficient to answer all questions of regulatory interest. A notable strength is the option for linkage to the Prescribed Drug Registry and to information on education and socioeconomic status. Data on drugs used during hospitalization were also collected to some extent. Outcome measures collected resemble those used in relevant clinical trials. All registries collected patient-reported outcome measures. The number of publications from the registries was substantial, with studies of appropriate design, including randomized registry trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality registries may provide a valuable source of post-marketing data on drug effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Closer collaboration between registries and regulators to improve quality and usefulness of registry data could benefit both regulatory utility and value for health care providers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述瑞典一些与监管决策相关的医疗保健质量登记处(QRs)的内容和程序。

方法

组织了一次研讨会,七家瑞典质量登记处参与其中,随后这些登记处回答了一份关于药物治疗和结果登记内容的问卷。介绍了患者群体、覆盖范围、数据处理和质量控制,以及法律和伦理方面的内容。质量登记处的科学出版物被用作质量和科学相关性的补充衡量标准。

结果

所研究的登记处收集了与监管机构和卫生技术机构高度相关的临床数据。七家登记处中有五家提供了有关感兴趣药物的信息。在应用外部质量标准时,我们发现满足程度较高,尽管关于药物治疗的信息不足以回答所有监管关注的问题。一个显著的优势是可以与处方药登记处以及教育和社会经济地位信息建立联系。住院期间使用药物的数据也有一定程度的收集。收集的结果指标与相关临床试验中使用的指标相似。所有登记处都收集了患者报告的结果指标。登记处的出版物数量可观,有设计恰当的研究,包括随机登记试验。

结论

质量登记处可能为药物有效性、安全性和成本效益提供有价值的上市后数据来源。登记处与监管机构之间加强合作以提高登记数据的质量和实用性,可能对监管效用和医疗保健提供者的价值都有益处。