Suppr超能文献

生物制剂和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药物在类风湿关节炎临床应用中的安全性:来自 ARTIS 研究计划的结果。

Safety of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis as used in clinical practice: results from the ARTIS programme.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 May;82(5):601-610. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223762. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Longitudinal clinical registry-infrastructures such as Anti-Rheumatic Therapies in Sweden (ARTIS) allow simultaneous comparison of the safety of individual immunomodulatory drugs used in clinical practice, with consistent definitions of treatment cohorts, follow-up and outcomes. Our objective was to assess and compare incidence rates of key safety outcomes for individual targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), updating previous reports and including newer treatments including Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi).

METHODS

Nationwide register-based cohort study including all patients with RA in Sweden registered as starting any b/tsDMARD 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2020, followed until 30 June 2021 (N=20 117). The incidence rates of selected outcomes, identified through national healthcare registers, were compared between individual b/tsDMARDs, adjusted for confounding by demographics, RA disease characteristics and comorbidity.

RESULTS

There were marked differences in treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (rates per 1000 person-years ranged from 18 on rituximab to 57 on tofacitinib), but few significant differences were observed for the serious adverse events under study. Neither cardiovascular events nor general serious infections were more frequent on baricitinib or tofacitinib versus bDMARDs, but JAKi were associated with higher rates of hospital-treated herpes zoster (HR vs etanercept, 3.82 (95% CI 2.05 to 7.09) and 4.00 (1.59 to 10.06)). Low number of events limited some comparisons, in particular for sarilumab and tofacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Data from ARTIS supports that the b/tsDMARDs currently used to treat RA have acceptable and largely similar safety profiles, but differences exist in particular concerning tolerability and specific infection risks.

摘要

目的

纵向临床登记基础设施,如瑞典抗风湿治疗(ARTIS),允许同时比较在临床实践中使用的个体免疫调节剂药物的安全性,同时具有一致的治疗队列、随访和结局定义。我们的目的是评估和比较个体靶向合成或生物疾病修正抗风湿药物(b/ts DMARDs)在类风湿关节炎(RA)中的关键安全性结局的发生率,更新以前的报告,并包括新的治疗方法,包括 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)。

方法

这是一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究,纳入了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在瑞典登记开始使用任何 b/tsDMARD 的所有 RA 患者(N=20117),随访至 2021 年 6 月 30 日。通过国家卫生保健登记册确定的选定结局的发生率,在个体 b/tsDMARDs 之间进行比较,同时调整了人口统计学、RA 疾病特征和合并症的混杂因素。

结果

由于不良事件而导致的治疗中断率差异显著(每 1000 人年的发生率范围从利妥昔单抗的 18 例到托法替尼的 57 例),但研究中的严重不良事件很少有显著差异。巴利昔单抗或托法替尼与 bDMARDs 相比,心血管事件或一般严重感染均不更常见,但 JAKi 与更高的带状疱疹医院治疗率相关(HR 比依那西普,3.82(95%CI 2.05 至 7.09)和 4.00(1.59 至 10.06))。由于事件数量较少,限制了某些比较,特别是对于萨拉鲁单抗和托法替尼。

结论

ARTIS 的数据支持目前用于治疗 RA 的 b/tsDMARDs 具有可接受的且基本相似的安全性特征,但在耐受性和特定感染风险方面存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c66/10176333/5bfa57baf8f9/ard-2022-223762f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验