Department of Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1442-1450. doi: 10.1002/pds.4196. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
Regulatory agencies and other stakeholders increasingly rely on data collected through registries to support their decision-making. Data from registries are a cornerstone of post-marketing surveillance for monitoring the use of medicines in clinical practice. This study was aimed at gaining further insight into the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) requests for new registries and registry studies using existing registries and to review the experience gained in their conduct.
European Public Assessment Reports were consulted to identify products for which a request for a registry was made as a condition of the marketing authorisation. All centrally authorised products that received a positive opinion of the EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2013 were included. Data regarding registry design and experiences were collected from EMA electronic record keeping systems.
Of 392 products that received a positive Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use opinion during 2005-2013, 31 registries were requested for 30 products in total. Sixty-five percent were product registries whereas 35% were disease registries and 71% of the registries had a primary safety objective. Most commonly reported issues with registries were delayed time to start and low patient accrual rates.
The delays found in getting new registries up and running support the need to improve the timeliness of data collection in the post-marketing setting. Methodological challenges met in conducting this study highlighted the need for a clarification of definitions and epidemiological concepts around patient registries. The results will inform the EMA Patient Registry initiative to support use of existing patient registries for the post-authorisation benefit-risk monitoring of medicinal products. © 2017 Commonwealth of Australia. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
监管机构和其他利益相关者越来越依赖通过注册收集的数据来支持他们的决策。来自注册的数据是药品上市后监测的基础,用于监测药品在临床实践中的使用情况。本研究旨在进一步了解欧洲药品管理局(EMA)对新注册和利用现有注册进行注册研究的要求,并审查其实施经验。
查阅了欧洲公共评估报告,以确定作为上市许可条件而提出注册请求的产品。将 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间 EMA 人用药品委员会给予积极意见的所有集中授权产品都包括在内。从 EMA 电子记录保存系统中收集有关注册设计和经验的数据。
在 2005-2013 年获得人用药品委员会积极意见的 392 种产品中,共有 30 种产品的 31 个注册被要求。其中 65%是产品注册,35%是疾病注册,71%的注册具有主要安全性目标。报告的与注册相关的最常见问题是开始时间延迟和患者入组率低。
发现新注册启动和运行延迟支持需要改善上市后数据收集的及时性。在进行这项研究中遇到的方法学挑战突显了需要澄清患者注册方面的定义和流行病学概念。研究结果将为 EMA 患者注册倡议提供信息,以支持利用现有的患者注册来进行药品上市后获益-风险监测。