Gaelic Sport Research Center, Department of Science, Institute of Technology Tallaght Dublin, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan;33(1):180-187. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001887.
Malone, S, Hughes, B, and Collins, K. The influence of exercise-to-rest ratios on physical and physiological performance during hurling-specific small-sided games. J Strength Cond Res 33(1): 180-187, 2019-The current study examined the impact of different exercise-to-rest ratios on hurling-specific small-sided games (SSG). Thirty-four (n = 34) hurling players were monitored during an in-season training period. Heart rate (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) and global positioning system technology (4-Hz; VX Sport, Lower Hutt, New Zealand) were used to analyze the physical and physiological differences between exercise-to-rest ratios across bouts of SSG. Total distance (m), high-speed distance (m) (≥17 km·h), very high-speed distance (≥22 km·h) (m), total accelerations (n), acceleration distance (m), peak velocity (km·h), and % maximum heart rate (%HRmax) were measured. Exercise-to-rest ratios of 2:1 (d = 0.65 ± 0.12; moderate), and 1:1 (d = 0.43 ± 0.12; small), resulted in significant reductions in high-speed distance, very high-speed distance, and acceleration distance. Exercise-to-rest ratios of 1:2 (d = 0.63 ± 0.21; moderate), and 1:3 (d = 1.23 ± 0.22; large), resulted in increased high-speed distance, very high-speed distance, and acceleration distance, but only after the third bout. The first bout of SSG resulted in the lowest %HRmax when compared with all other bouts (d = 0.63 ± 0.22; moderate). A significant bout-to-bout increase in %HRmax independent of exercise-to-rest ratio (d = 0.25 ± 0.04; small) was observed. Exercise-to-rest ratios of 2:1 (d = 0.65 ± 0.14; moderate), and 1:1 (d = 0.65 ± 0.24; moderate), resulted in significantly higher %HRmax during all SSG bouts; however, exercise-to-rest ratios of 1:2 (d = 0.25 ± 0.04; small), and 1:3 (d = 0.15 ± 0.04; trivial), resulted in lower %HRmax during SSG. Coaches should be aware that reducing the rest between bouts of SSGs (2:1 and 1:1 exercise-to-rest ratios) increases the physiological response (%HRmax) with reduced high-speed running performances. Coaches now have data to allow them tp best prepare for session needs with regard to specific SSG exercise-to-rest ratios.
马龙、休斯和柯林斯研究了不同的运动与休息比例对投球特定的小型方场比赛（SSG）的影响。34 名（n=34）投球运动员在赛季中进行了监测。使用心率（Polar Electro Oy，Kempele，芬兰）和全球定位系统技术（4-Hz；VX Sport，Lower Hutt，新西兰）分析了 SSG 各回合之间运动与休息比例的身体和生理差异。总距离（m）、高速距离（m）（≥17km·h）、超高速度距离（≥22km·h）（m）、总加速度（n）、加速度距离（m）、峰值速度（km·h）和最大心率百分比（%HRmax）。2:1（d=0.65±0.12；中等）和 1:1（d=0.43±0.12；小）的运动与休息比例导致高速距离、超高速度距离和加速度距离显著减少。1:2（d=0.63±0.21；中等）和 1:3（d=1.23±0.22；大）的运动与休息比例增加了高速距离、超高速度距离和加速度距离，但仅在第三回合后。与所有其他回合相比，第一回合 SSG 的 %HRmax 最低（d=0.63±0.22；中等）。观察到 %HRmax 随回合的显著增加，与运动与休息比例无关（d=0.25±0.04；小）。2:1（d=0.65±0.14；中等）和 1:1（d=0.65±0.24；中等）的运动与休息比例在所有 SSG 回合中都导致了更高的 %HRmax；然而，1:2（d=0.25±0.04；小）和 1:3（d=0.15±0.04；小）的运动与休息比例在 SSG 中导致了更低的 %HRmax。教练应该意识到，减少 SSG 回合之间的休息时间（2:1 和 1:1 的运动与休息比例）会增加生理反应（%HRmax），同时降低高速跑动表现。教练现在有了数据，可以根据特定的 SSG 运动与休息比例，最好地满足训练需求。
