Suppr超能文献

儿童青少年症状问卷(CASI-4R)抑郁分量表识别青少年心境障碍的诊断效率。

Diagnostic Efficiency of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI-4R) Depression Subscale for Identifying Youth Mood Disorders.

机构信息

b Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

a Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

出版信息

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Sep-Oct;47(5):832-846. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280807. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Abstract

This study examined the diagnostic and clinical utility of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-4 R (CASI-4 R) Depressive and Dysthymia subscale for detecting mood disorders in youth (ages 6-12; M = 9.37) visiting outpatient mental health clinics. Secondary analyses (N = 700) utilized baseline data from the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms study. Semistructured interviews with youth participants and their parents/caregivers determined psychiatric diagnoses. Caregivers and teachers completed the CASI-4 R. CASI-4 R depressive symptom severity and symptom count scores each predicted mood disorder diagnoses. Both caregiver scores (symptom severity and symptom count) of the CASI-4 R subscale significantly identified youth mood disorders (areas under the curve [AUCs] = .78-.79, ps < .001). The symptom severity version showed a small but significant advantage. Teacher symptom severity report did not significantly predict mood disorder diagnosis (AUC = .56, p > .05), whereas the teacher symptom count report corresponded to a small effect size (AUC = .61, p < .05). The CASI-4 R Depression scale showed strong incrememental validity even controlling for the other CASI-4 R scales. Caregiver subscale cutoff scores were calculated to assist in ruling in (diagnostic likelihood ratio [DLR] = 3.73) or ruling out (DLR = 0.18) presence of a mood disorder. The CASI-4 R Depressive subscale caregiver report can help identify youth mood disorders, and using DLRs may help improve diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

本研究考察了儿童和青少年症状清单-4R(CASI-4R)抑郁和心境恶劣亚量表在检测 6-12 岁(M=9.37)就诊于门诊心理健康诊所的青少年情绪障碍方面的诊断和临床效用。二次分析(N=700)利用了纵向评估躁狂症状研究的基线数据。对青少年参与者及其父母/照顾者进行半结构化访谈,以确定精神科诊断。照顾者和教师完成了 CASI-4R。CASI-4R 抑郁症状严重程度和症状计数评分均预测情绪障碍诊断。CASI-4R 子量表的照顾者得分(症状严重程度和症状计数)均能显著识别青少年情绪障碍(曲线下面积 [AUCs] =.78-.79,p <.001)。症状严重程度版本显示出较小但显著的优势。教师的症状严重程度报告不能显著预测情绪障碍诊断(AUC =.56,p >.05),而教师的症状计数报告对应较小的效应量(AUC =.61,p <.05)。即使控制了其他 CASI-4R 量表,CASI-4R 抑郁量表也显示出较强的增量有效性。计算了照顾者子量表的截断分数,以帮助确定(诊断似然比 [DLR] = 3.73)或排除(DLR = 0.18)情绪障碍的存在。照顾者报告的 CASI-4R 抑郁子量表可帮助识别青少年情绪障碍,使用 DLR 可能有助于提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions.心理科学可以改善诊断决策。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2000 May;1(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.001. Epub 2000 May 1.
10
Age and gender differences in depression across adolescence: real or 'bias'?青少年抑郁症的年龄和性别差异:真实存在还是“偏见”?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;53(9):973-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02553.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验