Chernoff Miriam, Angelidou Konstantia Nadia, Williams Paige L, Brouwers Pim, Warshaw Meredith, Nachman Sharon
Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018 Dec;25(4):420-428. doi: 10.1007/s10880-018-9550-2.
Brief psychiatric assessment tools are needed for evaluating children affected by HIV for emotional and behavioral problems. We compared a self-administered symptom rating scale (CASI-4R) to a semi-structured diagnostic interview (DICA-P) in 136 U.S. children affected by HIV. Agreement and performance measures for the two instruments were computed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, anxiety, and disruptive behavior. Correlations and regression analyses were conducted to compare the two instruments, and to evaluate their associations with social, academic, and global function. Higher CASI-4R symptom severity scores were associated with DICA diagnoses (p < 0.02 for all disorders). Agreement (κ) between DICA diagnoses and CASI-4R Clinical Cutoffs (which incorporated symptoms and impairment) was low to moderate (0.19-0.40 for all disorders). Thirty-two percent of cases with a DICA diagnosis were identified by the CASI-4R Clinical Cutoff (sensitivity), yet over 90% of DICA-negative cases were negative by the CASI-4R (specificity). Sensitivity was higher using CASI-4R Severity Score thresholds based on median scores compared to the DICA diagnoses. The presence and severity of psychiatric symptoms and impairment were associated with poorer academic, social, and global function. The CASI-4R symptom checklist can be used to inexpensively screen youth affected by HIV for emotional and behavioral problems, although it is important that there be appropriate mental health evaluation follow-up.
需要简短的精神科评估工具来评估受艾滋病毒影响儿童的情绪和行为问题。我们在美国136名受艾滋病毒影响的儿童中,将一种自我管理的症状评定量表(儿童青少年症状清单-4修订版,CASI-4R)与一种半结构化诊断访谈(儿童青少年诊断访谈-父母版,DICA-P)进行了比较。针对注意力缺陷多动障碍、抑郁症、焦虑症和破坏性行为,计算了这两种工具的一致性和性能指标。进行了相关性和回归分析,以比较这两种工具,并评估它们与社会、学业和整体功能的关联。较高的CASI-4R症状严重程度得分与DICA诊断相关(所有障碍的p值均<0.02)。DICA诊断与CASI-4R临床临界值(纳入了症状和损害情况)之间的一致性(κ)为低到中度(所有障碍的κ值为0.19 - 0.40)。CASI-4R临床临界值识别出了32%有DICA诊断的病例(敏感性),然而超过90% DICA诊断为阴性的病例经CASI-4R判定也为阴性(特异性)。与DICA诊断相比,如果使用基于中位数得分的CASI-4R严重程度得分阈值,敏感性更高。精神症状和损害的存在及严重程度与较差的学业、社会和整体功能相关。CASI-4R症状清单可用于廉价筛查受艾滋病毒影响的青少年的情绪和行为问题,不过重要的是要有适当的心理健康评估随访。