• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰勒马克乳房评分:评估乳房手术后结果的有效方法。

The Telemark Breast Score: a Valid Method for Evaluation of Outcome after Breast Surgery.

作者信息

Begic Anadi, Stark Birgit

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; and Department for Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Feb 22;5(2):e1240. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001240. eCollection 2017 Feb.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001240
PMID:28280676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5340491/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

"Telemark Breast Score" (TBS) has been developed at Telemark Hospital in Norway for evaluation of results after breast surgery based on standardized patients' photographs taken as a part of daily routine. Its reliability has recently been tested and approved. The external validity of the TBS was assessed by matching its data against the internationally recognized Breast-Q (BQ) questionnaire as a further step to study the validity of this new tool.

METHODS

The ideal distribution of breast volume is 45% of the total volume above and 55% below the nipple, and a 40° slope line at the upper pole. TBS makes the evaluation of these parameters of breast aesthetics more explicit. The method has been tested on photographs from 31 patients operated on for breast cancer with the Deep Inferior Perforator Flap. The evaluation was done by an independent experienced plastic surgeon earlier participating in the test-retests. The external validity of TBS was investigated against domains 1 and 3 of the BQ reconstruction module. The concordance between ratings was analyzed.

RESULTS

Concordance between TBS items and BQ domain 1 items regarding patient satisfaction, and between TBS items and BQ domain 3 items regarding how the patient experienced the outcome of breast reconstruction was relatively high except for 6 comparisons where we could not statistically ensure that more pairs were concordant than discordant. A total of 178 comparisons appeared to be concordant. This means that for all other comparisons, there was a preponderance of pairs of concordant observations, which indicates that measurements from the 2 instruments follow each other.

CONCLUSION

The present data indicate that the TBS can be recommended as a valid tool to professionals for assessment of the outcome after breast reconstruction.

摘要

背景

“泰勒马克乳房评分”(TBS)由挪威泰勒马克医院开发,用于根据日常拍摄的标准化患者照片评估乳房手术后的效果。其可靠性最近已得到测试和认可。作为研究这一新工具有效性的进一步步骤,通过将TBS数据与国际认可的乳房-Q(BQ)问卷进行匹配,评估了TBS的外部有效性。

方法

理想的乳房体积分布是乳头上方占总体积的45%,乳头下方占55%,上极有一条40°的斜线。TBS使乳房美学这些参数的评估更加明确。该方法已在31例接受腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房手术患者的照片上进行了测试。评估由一名较早参与重测的独立经验丰富的整形外科医生进行。针对BQ重建模块的第1和第3领域研究了TBS的外部有效性。分析了评分之间的一致性。

结果

除了6项比较中我们无法从统计学上确保一致的配对多于不一致的配对外,TBS项目与BQ第1领域项目在患者满意度方面,以及TBS项目与BQ第3领域项目在患者对乳房重建结果的体验方面的一致性相对较高。总共178项比较似乎是一致的。这意味着对于所有其他比较,一致观察的配对占优势,这表明两种工具的测量结果相互一致。

结论

目前的数据表明,TBS可作为一种有效的工具推荐给专业人员,用于评估乳房重建后的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d809/5340491/b1e2de74519c/gox-5-e1240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d809/5340491/b1e2de74519c/gox-5-e1240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d809/5340491/b1e2de74519c/gox-5-e1240-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Telemark Breast Score: a Valid Method for Evaluation of Outcome after Breast Surgery.泰勒马克乳房评分:评估乳房手术后结果的有效方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Feb 22;5(2):e1240. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001240. eCollection 2017 Feb.
2
The Aesthetic Items Scale: A Tool for the Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcome after Breast Reconstruction.美学项目量表:一种评估乳房重建术后美学效果的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Mar 1;5(3):e1254. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001254. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A Study of Patient Satisfaction.保留乳头的乳房切除术及采用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣的即刻乳房重建:患者满意度研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6):639-643. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001404.
4
Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after delayed breast reconstruction using DIEP flap: a 10 years' follow-up survey.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣延迟乳房重建术后的生活质量、患者满意度及美容效果:一项10年随访调查
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2019 Apr;53(2):119-124. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1562459. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
6
International validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BRECON23 quality-of-life questionnaire for women undergoing breast reconstruction.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织 QLQ-BRECON23 生活质量问卷在接受乳房重建的女性中的国际验证。
Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):209-222. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10656. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
The Medial Pillar Island Flap for Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction of Upper Pole Defects.用于乳房上极缺损肿瘤整形乳房重建的内侧柱岛状皮瓣
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4):375-381. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001673.
8
[Abdominal perforator flap (DIEP) and autologous latissimus dorsi in breast reconstruction. A retrospective comparative study about the first 60 cases of a same surgeon].[腹壁穿支皮瓣(腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣)与背阔肌自体组织乳房重建:同一术者的前60例回顾性对比研究]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2014 Apr;59(2):103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
9
Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants.乳头乳晕重建:满意度及临床决定因素
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):457-63; discussion 464-5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00013.
10
One-stage nipple and breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap after a skin-sparing mastectomy.保乳乳房切除术后采用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行一期乳头和乳房重建。
Arch Plast Surg. 2020 Jan;47(1):26-32. doi: 10.5999/aps.2019.00598. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Erratum: The Telemark Breast Score: A Valid Method for Evaluation of Outcome after Breast Surgery-Erratum.勘误:泰勒马克乳房评分:一种评估乳房手术后结局的有效方法——勘误。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e3192. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003192. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The Telemark Breast Score: A Reliable Method for the Evaluation of Results after Breast Surgery.泰勒马克乳房评分:一种评估乳房手术后结果的可靠方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3):390e-400e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002487.
2
Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery.测量美容外科的结果。
Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;40(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
3
The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.BREAST-Q:在独立临床样本中的进一步验证。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b.
4
Evaluation of volume and shape of breasts: comparison between traditional and three-dimensional techniques.乳房体积与形态评估:传统技术与三维技术的比较
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Feb;45(1):14-22. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2010.542652.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine.整形外科学中的患者报告结局测量指标:在循证医学中的应用与解读。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1361-1367. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182063276.
6
Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.测量肿瘤乳腺外科患者的生活质量:患者报告的结局测量工具的系统评价。
Breast J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):587-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00983.x.
7
Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q.一种用于乳房手术的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发:BREAST-Q。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807.
8
Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.美容手术的结果测量:文献综述
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jan;111(1):469-80; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000036041.67101.48.
9
Concordance between ratings using different scales for the same variable.针对同一变量使用不同量表进行评分时的一致性。
Stat Med. 2000 Dec 30;19(24):3483-96. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3483::aid-sim786>3.0.co;2-a.