Suppr超能文献

在自发报告系统中利用卡方统计量筛查药物不良相互作用

Utilization of chi-square statistics for screening adverse drug-drug interactions in spontaneous reporting systems.

作者信息

Gosho Masahiko, Maruo Kazushi, Tada Keisuke, Hirakawa Akihiro

机构信息

Department of Clinical Trial and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Translational Medical Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;73(6):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2233-3. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We proposed a statistical criterion to detect drug-drug interactions causing adverse drug reactions in spontaneous reporting systems.

METHODS

The used criterion quantitatively measures the discrepancy between the observed and expected number of adverse events via chi-square statistics. We compared the performance of our method with that of Norén et al. (Stat Med 2008; 27 (16): 3057-3070) through a simulation study.

RESULTS

When the number of events for a combination of two drugs was equal to or lower than two, the false positive rate for our method ranged from 0.01 to 0.08, whereas the rate for Norén's method ranged from 0.01 to 0.06. The sensitivity for our method ranged from 0.09 to 0.29, whereas the sensitivity for Norén's method ranged from 0.03 to 0.24. The area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve for our method was significantly larger than that for Norén's methods regardless of simulation settings. The proposed method was also applied to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database, and a recognized drug-drug interaction was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed criterion controlled false positives at an acceptable level and had higher sensitivity than that of Norén's method had when events were rare.

摘要

目的

我们提出了一种统计标准,用于在自发报告系统中检测引起药物不良反应的药物相互作用。

方法

所使用的标准通过卡方统计量定量测量观察到的不良事件数量与预期数量之间的差异。我们通过模拟研究将我们的方法与诺伦等人(《统计医学》2008年;27(16):3057 - 3070)的方法的性能进行了比较。

结果

当两种药物组合的事件数量等于或低于两个时,我们方法的假阳性率在0.01至0.08之间,而诺伦方法的假阳性率在0.01至0.06之间。我们方法的灵敏度在0.09至0.29之间,而诺伦方法的灵敏度在0.03至0.24之间。无论模拟设置如何,我们方法的受试者操作特征曲线下面积均显著大于诺伦方法的。所提出的方法还应用于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库,并检测到一种已确认的药物相互作用。

结论

所提出的标准将假阳性控制在可接受水平,并且在事件罕见时比诺伦方法具有更高的灵敏度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验