Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0300268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300268. eCollection 2024.
Several statistical methods have been proposed to detect adverse drug reactions induced by taking two drugs together. These suspected adverse drug reactions can be discovered through post-market drug safety surveillance, which mainly relies on spontaneous reporting system database. Most previous studies have applied statistical models to real world data, but it is not clear which method outperforms the others. We aimed to assess the performance of various detection methods by implementing simulations under various conditions. We reviewed proposed approaches to detect signals indicating drug-drug interactions (DDIs) including the Ω shrinkage measure, the chi-square statistic, the proportional reporting ratio, the concomitant signal score, the additive model and the multiplicative model. Under various scenarios, we conducted a simulation study to examine the performances of the methods. We also applied the methods to Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) data. Of the six methods considered in the simulation study, the Ω shrinkage measure and the chi-square statistic with threshold = 2 had higher sensitivity for detecting the true signals than the other methods in most scenarios while controlling the false positive rate below 0.05. When applied to the KAERS data, the two methods detected one known DDI for QT prolongation and one unknown (suspected) DDI for hyperkalemia. The performance of various signal detection methods for DDI may vary. It is recommended to use several methods together, rather than just one, to make a reasonable decision.
已经提出了几种统计方法来检测同时服用两种药物引起的不良反应。这些可疑的药物不良反应可以通过上市后药物安全性监测来发现,主要依赖于自发报告系统数据库。大多数先前的研究已经将统计模型应用于真实世界的数据,但不清楚哪种方法更优。我们旨在通过在各种条件下实施模拟来评估各种检测方法的性能。我们回顾了用于检测药物-药物相互作用(DDI)信号的方法,包括Ω收缩测量、卡方统计、比例报告比、伴随信号评分、加法模型和乘法模型。在各种情况下,我们进行了模拟研究来检验这些方法的性能。我们还将这些方法应用于韩国不良事件报告系统(KAERS)数据。在模拟研究中考虑的六种方法中,在大多数情况下,Ω收缩测量和卡方统计(阈值=2)比其他方法具有更高的灵敏度,可以检测到真实信号,同时将假阳性率控制在 0.05 以下。当应用于 KAERS 数据时,这两种方法检测到一个已知的 QT 延长 DDI 和一个未知(疑似)高钾血症 DDI。DDI 的各种信号检测方法的性能可能有所不同。建议一起使用几种方法,而不是仅仅使用一种方法,以做出合理的决策。