Chan Joshua C K, Peters Rachel L, Koplin Jennifer J, Dharmage Shyamali C, Gurrin Lyle C, Wake Melissa, Tang Mimi L K, Prescott Susan, Allen Katrina J
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar-Apr;5(2):398-409.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.021.
Oral food challenge is the main tool for diagnosing food allergy, but there is little data on the reaction profiles of young children undergoing challenges, nor how these reactions compare to reactions on accidental ingestion in the community.
To compare reaction profiles from food challenges and parent-reported reactions on accidental ingestion, and assess predictors of severe reactions.
HealthNuts is a longitudinal population-based cohort study of 5276 1-year-old infants. Infants underwent skin prick tests and those with identifiable wheals were offered food challenges. Food challenges were repeated at age 4 years in those with previous food allergy or reporting new food allergies. Community-reported reactions were ascertained from parent questionnaires.
Food challenges were undertaken in 916 children at age 1 year and 357 children at age 4 years (a total of 2047 peanut, egg, or sesame challenges). Urticaria was the most common sign in positive challenges at both ages (age 1 year, 88.7%, and age 4 years, 71.2%) although angioedema was significantly more common at age 4 years (40.1%) than at age 1 year (12.9%). Anaphylaxis was equally uncommon at both ages (2.1% and 2.8% of positive challenges at ages 1 and 4 years, respectively) but more common for peanut than for egg (4.5% and 1.2% of positive challenges at ages 1 and 4 years, respectively). The patterns of presenting signs reported during community reactions were similar to those observed in formal food challenges. Serum food-specific IgE levels of 15 kU/L or more were associated with moderate to severe reactions but skin prick test was not.
There was a shift from the most common presenting reaction of urticaria during food challenges toward more angioedema in older children. Serum food-specific IgE levels were associated with reaction severity.
口服食物激发试验是诊断食物过敏的主要手段,但关于接受激发试验的幼儿的反应特征,以及这些反应与社区中意外摄入食物后的反应相比情况如何,相关数据较少。
比较食物激发试验的反应特征与家长报告的意外摄入食物后的反应,并评估严重反应的预测因素。
健康坚果研究是一项基于人群的纵向队列研究,纳入了5276名1岁婴儿。婴儿接受了皮肤点刺试验,对出现可识别风团的婴儿进行食物激发试验。既往有食物过敏或报告新发食物过敏的婴儿在4岁时重复进行食物激发试验。通过家长问卷确定社区报告的反应。
916名1岁儿童和357名4岁儿童进行了食物激发试验(共进行了2047次花生、鸡蛋或芝麻激发试验)。在两个年龄段的阳性激发试验中,荨麻疹都是最常见的症状(1岁时为88.7%,4岁时为71.2%),尽管血管性水肿在4岁时(40.1%)比1岁时(12.9%)明显更常见。过敏反应在两个年龄段同样不常见(1岁和4岁时阳性激发试验的发生率分别为2.1%和2.8%),但花生激发试验的过敏反应比鸡蛋激发试验更常见(1岁和4岁时阳性激发试验的发生率分别为4.5%和1.2%)。社区反应中报告的症状出现模式与正式食物激发试验中观察到的相似。血清食物特异性IgE水平≥15 kU/L与中度至重度反应相关,但皮肤点刺试验则不然。
在食物激发试验中,较年幼儿童最常见的症状从荨麻疹向血管性水肿转变。血清食物特异性IgE水平与反应严重程度相关。