Ilyas Huma, Masih Ilyas
, Kievitlaan 9, 2289ED, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611AX, Delft, The Netherlands.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 May;24(13):12081-12091. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8740-z. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
The large land area requirement of constructed wetlands (CWs) is a major limitation of its application especially in densely populated and mountainous areas. This review paper provides insights on different strategies applied for the reduction of land area including stack design and intensification of CWs with different aeration methods. The impacts of different aeration methods on the performance and land area reduction were extensively and critically evaluated for nine wetland systems under three aeration strategies such as tidal flow (TF), effluent recirculation (ER), and artificial aeration (AA) applied on three types of CWs including vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW), horizontal flow constructed wetland (HFCW), and hybrid constructed wetland (HCW). The area reduction and pollutant removal efficiency showed substantial variation among different types of CWs and aeration strategies. The ER-VFCW designated the smallest footprint of 1.1 ± 0.5 m PE (population equivalent) followed by TF-VFCW with the footprint of 2.1 ± 1.8 m PE, and the large footprint was of AA-HFCW (7.8 ± 4.7 m PE). When footprint and removal efficiency both are the major indicators for the selection of wetland type, the best options for practical application could be TF-VFCW, ER-HCW, and AA-HCW. The data and results outlined in this review could be instructive for futures studies and practical applications of CWs for wastewater treatment, especially in land-limited regions.
人工湿地(CWs)所需的大面积土地是其应用的主要限制因素,尤其是在人口密集和山区。本文综述了为减少土地面积而采用的不同策略,包括堆叠设计和采用不同曝气方法强化人工湿地。针对垂直流人工湿地(VFCW)、水平流人工湿地(HFCW)和复合人工湿地(HCW)三种类型的人工湿地,在潮汐流(TF)、出水回流(ER)和人工曝气(AA)三种曝气策略下,对九种湿地系统广泛且批判性地评估了不同曝气方法对性能和土地面积减少的影响。不同类型的人工湿地和曝气策略之间,面积减少和污染物去除效率存在显著差异。ER-VFCW的占地面积最小,为1.1±0.5 m PE(人口当量),其次是TF-VFCW,占地面积为2.1±1.8 m PE,而AA-HFCW的占地面积最大(7.8±4.7 m PE)。当占地面积和去除效率都是选择湿地类型的主要指标时,实际应用的最佳选择可能是TF-VFCW、ER-HCW和AA-HCW。本综述中概述的数据和结果可能对人工湿地处理废水的未来研究和实际应用具有指导意义,尤其是在土地有限的地区。